Gratz V. Bollinger

Words: 677
Pages: 3
Open Document
When I was born, the President of the United States was George W. Bush. George W. Bush is mostly remembered for being the President during the 9/11 terrorist attacks and for the 9/11 conspiracy theory that led to the famous internet catchphrase, “Bush did 9/11.” This phrase is often used jokingly to imply that the former president is the perpetrator behind the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks. Aside from that, he was also president during the time of the capture of Saddam Hussein, Iraq’s former president, who was sentenced to death for willful killing, illegal imprisonment, deportation, and torture. This was considered a major victory for Americans and an end to one of the most intensive manhunts in history. "And now the former dictator …show more content…
Supreme Court decision known as Gratz v. Bollinger. It was appealed from the Federal District Court, which granted the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction. The story involves two caucasian students who applied for admission to the University of Michigan, but were denied because the University favored underrepresented minorities. Both of the students claimed that doing so violated a section of the 14th amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court ruled 6-3, with a majority believing that the University’s use of racial preferences in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment and the Civil Rights Act. I do not agree with the majority opinion because I do not believe in the concept that caucasian individuals can experience racism. There is a difference between racism and prejudice. You see, in order for racism to exist, it must be backed by systemic oppression. That means that in order for something to be racist against a white person, it would have to be said somewhere they represent an abused and unpopular minority. This University was only doing genuine victims of racism a favor by encouraging them to pursue an education in a country where it is predominantly white people who have the privilege to do so. Therefore, I firmly believe that the university should not be obligated to change their …show more content…
At the time of my first birthday, in 2003, the top song of the year was “Lose yourself,” by Eminem, which was written for the hit movie 8 mile. However, that was not the top film at the time. The most popular movie in October of 2003 was actually Scary Movie 3. My birthday is also a seemingly important date for countless historic events, including the birthday of an influential American philosopher, John Dewey, whose birthday falls on the same day as mine in 1859. On this day, a U.S. citizen who served in the Army also pleaded guilty in New York to helping plan the United States Embassy bombings in Africa that consequently killed 224
Show More

Related Documents: Gratz V. Bollinger

Gratz Vs Bollinger Essay

The complexity of interpreting the Constitution is reflected through different Supreme Court rulings regarding controversial issues. In Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger, the U.S. Supreme Court had to determine whether or not the use of race in higher education admissions decisions was constitutional. In June, 2003, the Supreme Court ruled on two major affirmative action cases involving the University of Michigan’s admissions policies. Two petitioners claimed they were denied admission…

Words 1643 - Pages 7

Affirmative Action Pros And Cons

various people believe he only got to where he was because of Affirmative Action even though he could have been in the same place if Affirmative Action didn’t even exist. Thomas has vocalized that if he had the chance, he would overturn Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) which has been the origin for modern Affirmative Action (Justia 15). Another thing is that Affirmative Action is not needed anymore. Affirmative Action used to be needed in the 1960’s and 70s because of racial discrimination, this was a…

Words 1579 - Pages 7

Essay about Affirmative Action & Admissions Policies

purpose of remedying past discrimination, and/or that diversity is not a government’s compelling interest. This is an interesting tendency that is common among the lower courts. For example, delivering the opinion of the Fifth Circuit court in Hopwood v. Texas (1996), Jerry E. Smith writes "The University of Texas School of Law may not use race as a factor in deciding which applicants to admit in order to achieve a diverse student body, to combat the perceived effects of a hostile environment at the…

Words 2094 - Pages 9

Final Paper ENG102

in colleges. In 2003, the Supreme Court made two very important decisions regarding affirmative action in college admissions. In Grutter v. Bollinger, the court upheld that the University of Michigan law school’s use of race as one of many factors in admissions, agreeing that there was interest in promoting racial diversity on campus. However, in Gratz v. Bollinger the court struck down the University of Michigan’s system of undergraduate admissions in which every applicant from and underrepresented…

Words 1743 - Pages 7

Government: First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Navigation Privileges Precedent Essay

Alexys Allen August 1, 2014 Part Three: Court Cases 1. Marbury v. Madison(1803): Designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia the last minute appointment were never fully finalized Precedent: when the constitution conflicts with an act of the legislature that act is invalidated established the supreme courts power of judicial law 2. McCulloch v. Maryland(1819): The state of Maryland passed legislation to impose lanes on the bank, McCulloch the cashier, of Baltimore…

Words 3075 - Pages 13

Afirmative Action in the Public Sector Essay

Affirmative Action History and Current Trends of Affirmative Action in the Workplace Thema Willette PUAD 621 Professor Seeman May 8, 2012 Origins of Affirmative Action Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 made it unlawful for an employer "to fail or refuse to hire an individual because of that individual's race, color, sex... or national origin." Affirmative action went a step further to ensure that active…

Words 2052 - Pages 9

Arguments Against Affirmative Action

The first case is Grutter v. Bollinger in which Barbara Grutter, who is white, sued the University of Michigan on the grounds that her position in their law school was given to minority students that had scored lower on their entrance exams. Initially Grutter won her case in the district…

Words 3683 - Pages 15

Con Law Essay

review the constitutionality of decisions and actions of other branches of government Marbury v. Madison: Courts can order executive/legislative officials to perform non-discretionary duties, but not discretionary acts; Courts can review constitutionality of statutes passed. Only original jurisdiction for specific things: Ambassadors, foreign diplomats, cases in which the state is a party. Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee: federal courts can review state court determinations of federal/constitutional…

Words 7565 - Pages 31