How Julius Caesar Changes

Words: 1195
Pages: 5
Open Document
Before absorbing ourselves into the changes made during the reign of Julius Caesar over the Roman Empire, it would be wise to better understand how Rome was before Julius Caesar came into power. For an empire, or society if you will, that used scare tactics with its feared army to conquer lands and other nations and enslaved many people; Rome was very democratic when it came to its own people. The people of Rome would gather at large assemblies to elect their own officials to the Roman Senate. If the elected officials did not live up to the expectations brought with them when previously elected they could be voted out of their position come the next election. However, as Rome grew bigger and more powerful government positions became more …show more content…
Caesar was a determined man, ready and able to face all the dangers and evils that were set before him. As a person he was very tall with good stature and was liked by many. As a general he was excellent, he was very keen when it came to special tactics, strategy and had a good head for battle. Caesar contained characteristics of which one might find of a hero in an epic novel; he was patient, he was able to compose himself and plan for the best times to strike and was able to easily handle the pressure of leading hundreds of thousands of his loyal men into battle. Caesar was swift and quick when it came to battle, he was able to easily defeat his enemies, and he was a force to be reckoned with. As on might imagine Caesar’s troops were completely dedicated to him based on his reputation and skills he …show more content…
Learning of the intentions to invade and conquer Roman territory by the Helvetii tribe of southern Switzerland, Caesar mobilized his troops for battle. Caesar’s army went North and defeated the much larger Helvetii army, upon his return Caesar was glorified once again for his military conquest and vanquishing of yet another Roman enemy. The Senate honored Caesar with a 15 daylong holiday. The people of Rome at this point adored Caesar because of his military success and vanquishing of tribes that threatened Rome itself and the Roman way of life. However, the Senate was still very opposed to Caesar, resulting in a civil war in which Caesar was victorious and became dictator of Rome. As dictator of Rome, Caesar saw himself above the constitution of Rome and the law. After only two years in power Caesar declared himself “dictator for life” and declared he had complete control over all sectors of the government, his power was absolute. His view in the eyes of the Roman people was quickly starting to change from beloved War hero and a man who fought for the people, to an absolute dictator. The Roman people had great admiration for the Republic tradition of Rome, which Caesar had
Show More

Related Documents: How Julius Caesar Changes

How Did Julius Caesar Change Politically

Julius Caesar was a great leader but wanted too much power, therefore he was assassinated. Caesar was ordered to divorce his wife, but he refused and found an escape through the military. Caesar left Rome to join the army. He didn’t enter the forces as a common soldier. He was a military assistant to a provincial governor. He didn't need to return to Rome so he was posted to Cilicia. He proved himself a capable and courageous leader by saving a comrade. Caesar could return home because the regime…

Words 559 - Pages 3

Fate In Plutarch's Works

destiny with his tales about Julius Caesar in a historical document titled Lives of the Nobles:Julius Caesar. Likewise, William Shakespeare, an English poet, embodies the same overall ideal of fate and destiny, but with some minor altercations in his play, The Tragedy of Julius as it based upon Plutarch’s work. In both pieces of literature though, the account of Caesar’s rise to power is illustrated. Shakespeare…

Words 1671 - Pages 7

Julius Caesar Argumentative Essay

Trial Opinion: Argumentative Writing Motivations, no matter how pure, are not an excuse for inexcusable actions. In Rome, motivations were used as a reason for the murder of a leader. In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Acts 1-3, it is clear that Brutus was an active participant in the plot to kill Julius Caesar, and he should be held responsible along with the other conspirators for their actions. Brutus made a conscious decision to take the life of another person. He joined…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Julius Caesar Research Paper

Partner Essay Julius Caesar is a play written by William Shakespeare. It is about the murder of Julius Caesar and the war that occurs afterwards. Brutus and Antony are two of the main characters that have two different perspectives of Julius Caesar. Brutus saw Caesar as an ambitious person, while Antony saw Caesar as a good and powerful leader. Brutus saw Caesar as an ambitious person because Caesar uses humility to advance himself. But when he reaches the top, he turns his back on all of his supporters…

Words 310 - Pages 2

How Is Brutus A Tragic Hero

Honors English 10 10 May 2017 The Tragedy of Julius Caesar: The Tragic Hero The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare, shows the conspiracy of the killing of Julius Caesar. The play has five acts in it, each with a few different scenes. Marcus Brutus is one of the main characters in the play and has the main focal point on him throughout. He is one of the conspirators that killed Caesar and was the biggest surprise to Caesar, for he was one of his closest allies. The…

Words 1618 - Pages 7

Similarities Between Julius Caesar And Animal Farm

class and a lower class. In the two novels, Animal Farm and Julius Caesar, the richer, higher class citizens are really different from the lower class citizens. In the novella Animal Farm by George Orwell, a group of animals overthrows a farm and takes care of themselves and the farm instead of having humans care for them. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, a group of conspiracists plots to defeat the dictator Julius Caesar and is stopped by the people of Rome. In both stories, there…

Words 1297 - Pages 6

Michael Parenti's The Assassination Of Julius Caesar

The assassination of Julius Caesar is an event widely known, in part due to the play by William Shakespeare. Unlike in the play, Caesar did not say the famous words, “Et tu, Brute?” Historians say that it is likely he said nothing at all. He also had many more conspirators for his death than the eight that were in Shakespeare’s play. Like the character in the play, the real Julius Caesar was a political leader in the Roman Republic, which predates the Roman empire. Caesar had arrived for a Senate…

Words 924 - Pages 4

Julius Caesar Manipulation Essay

Nneka Okoye Mrs. Grillo Pd.2 ELA H II Julius Caesar Essay Within the story of Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus struggles with himself on whether to kill his close friend Julius Caesar. He reasoned that if he killed him then he would be stopping any chance of tyranny against the Roman people from Julius Caesar’s ambitious ways; yet he is very loyal to Julius so killing him would be difficult to accomplish. After some manipulation, he comes to the conclusion that the only way to save the Roman people…

Words 1140 - Pages 5

essay Com 124

of social, cultural and technological developments. This is apparent in the differently interpreted productions of ‘Julius Caesar’ originally written by William Shakespeare in 1599. The Film ‘Caesar and Cleopatra’ is a black and white film produced by Gabriel Pascal in 1945 revealing historical communication techniques while the Royal Shakespeare theatrical production ‘Julius Caesar’ communicates contemporary themes and methods. Both productions share a pivotal purpose in engaging the audience while…

Words 1847 - Pages 8

How Does Shakespeare Use Irony In Julius Caesar

William Shakespeare wrote a play based on the event of Caesar’s death, known as “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In the play, a man by the name of Mark Antony speaks at his good friend Julius Caesar’s funeral to defend him after he had died by the hand of a the Roman Senate because they feared he would become a tyrant. This play became known partially for its heavy use of irony. When writing the play, Shakespeare used irony in order to sway the opinion of the people of Rome, as well as the audience…

Words 939 - Pages 4