Indian Removal Dbq

Words: 1134

Pages: 5

Open Document

QUESTION 1

1. Did the Indian removal policy, and the conflicts waged in order to implement it, meet the criteria of a just war by Aquinas’ standards?

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. While Jackson’s specific reasoning’s sounded benevolent, the clear intent was the removal of Native American’s regardless the monetary cost or potential loss of life. The Indian Removal Act was highly contested throughout the months preceding its eventual signing into law. The Senate debated the topic for 7 sessions prior to receiving a passing vote of 28 to 19 and the House debated for a total of 5 sessions and narrowly passed with a vote of 102 to 97. Jackson rallied support by guaranteeing all parties would benefit from the Act. He stated “This emigration should be voluntary, for it would be as cruel as unjust to compel the aborigines to abandon the graves of their fathers, and seek a home in a distinct land.”

Prior to 1830, the Trade and Intercourse Act of 1802 had outlined the details concerning white settlers’ interactions with Native American’s. The Act allowed for normal trade and commerce, described the purchasing of lands, and included penalties for violations. Additionally, …show more content…
Did it violate or satisfy St. Augustine’s additional criteria for a just war?

The Indian Removal Act did not fully satisfy St. Augustine’s additional criteria for a just war. While a purpose was established, the peaceful and voluntary emigration of Native Americans westward, the purpose was morally wrong. Also, peaceful agreements had already been established in the Trade and Intercourse Act. The U.S. government voting in favor of the Indian Removal Act showed the international community that the U.S. had a willingness to reverse acts when it seemed necessary or of convenience.

QUESTION 4

4. Was the U.S. government’s argument a valid and ethical one? What would have been a reasonable and ethical policy, in your

Indian Removal Act DBQ

This act authorized the government to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within already established state borders. A few tribes went peacefully; nevertheless, many resisted (The). Jackson supported the act primarily because he believed that relocating the Indians would separate them from immediate contact with settlements of whites, free them from State powers, and further enable them to pursue happiness in their…

Words 652 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Act DBQ

occupied Georgia, the Cherokee indians lived in the land that is now Northern Georgia. They created a very organized civilization with a written language, newspaper, and even written constitutions. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Cherokee were harmful to the Americans, the Americans wanted to expand more west, and the Cherokee were going to get more land than they originally had. The Cherokee had been harmful to the Americans. The indians scalped Americans and killed them…

Words 533 - Pages 3

Dbq Indian Removal Act

The Indian Removal Act in 1830 was a relocation of the Indians from the eastern part of the United States to the West. President Andrew Jackson provided federal land for the Indians, west of the Mississippi River. Many people debate whether Jackson’s decision to remove the Indians was ethical. I believe Jackson used his decision to remove the Indians to prevent further conflict; he then was generous to allow them to make a profit off their land, and provided a place where the Indians could function…

Words 636 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Act Dbq

very humanity.” Nelson Mandela once said. The Indian Removal Act was signed by the president at the time, Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. The purpose of this law was to allow the Americans to exchange the land with Indians for settlers, however, they were still forced to move by the United States government and thousands of Cherokee died from their march, which is also known as the “Trail of Tears.” The Indian Removal Act was not justified and the Indians should be allowed to stay on their land because…

Words 925 - Pages 4

Dbq Indian Removal Act

As the Indian Removal Act took place. Many controversies were brought up with the white settlers and the President. Behalf, President Andrew Jackson defends his beliefs and rights among the treaty. However disagreements were among his points of arguing. The Native American are embraced, nor can they protect their land, and should be better off living in the west. Where the Five Civilized Tribes suffered through this era of momentous. In the mid-1880s, Native American tribes. Started to adjoin the…

Words 576 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Act DBQ

Introduction Did you ever wonder what was the Indian Removal Act and how it affected Native Americans and the United States in 1830? Well, you are in luck! Today, I am going to inform you about reasons the Indian Removal Act was created, events that occurred following the enforcement of this act and the impact it had on Native Americans and the United States. According to Gutschenritter's Like A Historian handout (2018), the Indian Removal Act was first introduced by President Andrew Jackson…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Dbq Louisiana Purchase

states. Soon the federal government pushed them out of their homelands and was made to go to “Indian territory” to help end the “Indian problem.” The Europeans wanted to deal with this problem by…

Words 882 - Pages 4

Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was significant because its purpose was to save the Indians from extinction. Unfortunately it added to the country’s national debt and created a divisional hatred towards President Jackson. It is understood that President Jackson had seen firsthand Native tribes becoming extinct trying to live side by side with white people. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 prevented many other tribes from becoming extinct by…

Words 1959 - Pages 8

Andrew Jackson Dbq Indian Removal

their homes during the winter. The consequence of the Indian removal the actions made by the European settlers in the colonial period. American leaders argued whether the Indians should be considered as human beings or as nations in their own right. In and angrily manner he followed the plans he had against all Indian which claimed constitutional rule and independence that were based east of the Mississippi River. They were to be removed to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi which is now known…

Words 175 - Pages 1

Dbq Summary: The Jacksonian Democracy

DBQ #4 The Jacksonian Democrats, the supporters and follower of Andrew Jackson were a party system that believed in greater democracy for the common man; their platform consisted of political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity, however, their doings from 1820 through 1830 show otherwise. The political democracy was not as the Jacksonians placed it to be, citizens were being influenced by the prejudice of itś head leader Andrew Jackson. Although, Andrew Jackson and…

Words 1062 - Pages 5