Jury Deliberation In 12 Angry Men

Words: 1061
Pages: 5
Open Document
Within the jury deliberation process, there are three stages. The first stage, orientation, is when the jury foreperson is elected and when general procedures are discussed (Costanzo & Krauss, 2018). Within the film “12 Angry Men” the jury foreman begins the orientation phase by describing the nature of the trial as well as potential sentencing outcomes (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). The jury foreman further explains that their verdict must be unanimous (Fonda & Lumet, 1957).
Following the explanation by the jury foreman, the jurors cast their votes prior to the analysis of the evidence (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). This approach to jury deliberation is known as the verdict-driven style of jury deliberation. According to Costanzo & Krauss (2018), the verdict-driven …show more content…
This moment is the turning point in the open conflict stage as it showed that other members of the jury were unsure about their opinion of the case. According to Costanzo & Krauss (2018), normative influence is when a jury member conforms because to group pressure. Although their vote conforms with the votes of the other members, their personal views oppose those of the others. The power of normative influence is best exhibited by Juror #3 who chastises another jury member following the second vote. Juror #3 attempts to use group pressure to ensure that the other members of the jury vote guilty. The actual jury member who changed his vote, Juror #9, exhibits the effects of informational influence. The change of vote by Juror #9 following the request to vote by Juror #9 is also an example of informational influence. According to Costanzo & Krauss (2018), informational influence occurs when a jury member changes their opinion based on persuasion rather than intimidation. Informational influence is the most effective form of influence because it relies on the strengths of the evidence rather than on …show more content…
Within the reconciliation phase, jurors attempt to ensure that everyone is satisfied with the agreed verdict (Costanzo & Krauss, 2018). The turning point of the reconciliation phase occurs when Juror #3 destroys the photograph of his son. The realization that he is projecting is disappointment and anger towards his son at the defendant leads Juror #3 to change his vote to not guilty. Following this change in vote, all of the jurors leave except for Juror #3 and Juror #8. Juror #8 comforts Juror #3 and hands him his coat. “Prejudice always complicates the truth.” Prejudice and bias played a large role in the decision-making process for several members of the jury. Prejudice was most prevalent is the decision-making process of Juror #3. Juror #3 is close-minded and throughout the movie, refuses to change his vote despite evidence which contradicts his opinion. Juror #3 eventually realize that he is prejudiced against the defendant after he destroys a picture of him and his son. This action cause Juror #3 to come to the realization that he is projecting the anger he feels towards his son onto the defendant (Fonda & Lumet,
Show More

Related Documents: Jury Deliberation In 12 Angry Men

America's Jury System In 12 Angry Men

they must attend jury duty if called upon. Reginald Rose’s play, 12 Angry Men, tells of a jury on the case of a young boy who is accused of killing his father and what happens in the deliberation room. This trial brings out the worst of these jurors, which raises questions for the reader, if America’s jury system is really the most effective way to give people a fair trial. Lack of interest, inadequacy to listen to others, and various upbringings justify just that. America’s jury system is not suitable…

Words 133 - Pages 1

12 Angry Men Assignment Essay

the film as they pertain to the problem the group is working on. In this film, the numerous functional and dysfunctional properties of the 12-jury men play a big role in analysing and evaluating the main purpose at hand, namely identifying the young man guilty or innocent for the murder of his father. The different roles the 12-jury men play in the deliberation of the capital murder case is prominent. Firstly, a role can be defined as a set of expected behaviour patterns attributed to someone occupying…

Words 2006 - Pages 9

12 Angry Men Essay examples

Comm 302 Professor Koteen March 6th, 2013 12 Angry Men Though the movie is out of date compared to the present day it can still relate to what occurs these days in similar group situations. The movie goes through the stages of group development as the plot unfolds. In the movie "Twelve Angry Men," twelve jury members were given the task to decide a boy's fate. The jury members, when beginning deliberation, were almost unanimous on a guilty verdict. All but one man was in favor…

Words 952 - Pages 4

12 Angry Men Essay

12 Angry Men The movie “12 Angry Men” is an excellent story about the interactions of 12 male jurors deliberating the fate of an accused murderer. The film opens right after the trial ends and the jury is about to begin deliberating, so the facts of the case and relevant testimony is only revealed through the discussions of the jurors. While this movie has merit on many different levels, for the purposes of this paper it will be used to illustrate examples of various influence techniques. When…

Words 588 - Pages 3

Proving Guilt In 12 Angry Men

In the Judicial system, men and women are given a chance to a fair trial to prove their innocence of the crime they are being accused of. The defendant gets the opportunity to defend their innocence and the accusers have the obligation to prove guilt. Arguments are allowed from both sides and the jury has the final say on the defendants fait. In the film 12 Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet, takes place in the courthouse where an eighteen year old boy is being tried for stabbing his father in the…

Words 506 - Pages 3

12 Angry Men Group Behavior Essay

Group Dynamics in 12 Angry Men In the 1957 classic 12 Angry Men, group dynamics are portrayed through a jury deliberation. Group dynamics is concerned with the structure and functioning of groups as well as the different types of roles each character plays. In the film, twelve men are brought together in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The personality conflicts, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to search for the truth are just a few…

Words 1595 - Pages 7

The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay

the play). Okay, Juror #3 is the angry father, and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote, right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something, they are passionate about their cause. Juror 3 is explosive and highly emotional Juror 8 thinks before speaking and is a calming influence on the jury Juror 3 is loud Juror 8 is quiet…

Words 1921 - Pages 8

Twelve Angry Men Essay

Tweleve angry Men The movie Twelve Angry Man is a drama which was written by Reginald Rose and was broadcast as a television play in 1954. It became a successful film in 1957 which concerned the deliberations of the jury of a homicide trial. It was a strained debate between twelve gentlemen about an 18-year-old boy who was accused to kill his father guilty or not guilty. It was a really interesting and dramatic situation. In the movie, there are 12 men with different characteristics. However…

Words 560 - Pages 3

12 Angry Men: Organizational Behavior Essay

12 Angry Men is a film that plays on the psychological mind, and highlights many features of Organizational Behavior. As the jury of 12 men convene in a locked room to decide the future, or lack thereof, of a young boy accused of murdering his father, they illustrate movement through the four stages of Bruce Tuckman’s Group Development Model of Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing. Along with this model, the movie portrays the difficulties and cohesiveness that 12 different men experience…

Words 2100 - Pages 9

Essay Leadership Analysis “Twelve Angry Men”

“Twelve Angry Men” Olu Adewumi NCLC 375: Prof. Ampthor The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is about twelve male jurors, brought together in a deliberation room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The deliberation starts with an 11-1 vote for guilty. As the movie progresses, the one man who had a reasonable doubt about the guilt or innocent of the young boy, convinces the other members of the jury to question…

Words 2842 - Pages 12