Kim Davis Case

Words: 1775
Pages: 8

Kim Davis, a Kentucky woman was arrested for the refusal of issuing a marriage license to a gay couple. Same sex marriage became legal in all fifty states in the month of June. The same sex marriage law displeased many conservative people in the United States. People were unhappy and disagreed with the law. Several people began to protest for the same sex marriage law to be changed. Davis’s refusal started a spark in the media, as many people became intrigued by her case. Davis refused to issue the marriage license because of her religious beliefs and was greatly criticized for her refusal. Davis was released after a week from being in jail by Judge Bunning’s order (Blinder and Perez-Pena). Multiple groups of people rallied and cheered for …show more content…
Presidential candidates such as Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, and Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey are some of the presidential candidates that have encouraged Davis. Blinder and Perez-Pena discuss Davis’s case and how it has become the latest test and commitment to religious freedom for presidential candidates. Davis’s case is a chance for the presidential candidates to get attention and show how willing the candidates are to help fight for religious liberty for Davis. Candidates that are vying for support from social conservatives issued increasingly heated statements to support Davis throughout the process of the release (Gabriel). Candidates like Senator Rand Paul and Governor Bobby Jindal are trying to get their word out to the public by criticizing the arrest of Davis (Blinder and Perez-Pena). Many people discuss that Davis should not interfere with jobs that could possibly interfere with her religious beliefs (Blinder and Perez-Pena). By having a job that will not interfere with her religious beliefs, it will protect her religious liberty and freedom. Blinder and Perez-Pena address Davis needs a job that will be contrary to her religious liberty. Jindal states, “I don’t think anyone should have to chose between following their conscience and religious beliefs and giving up their job and facing financial sanctions” (Gabriel). After being arrested for the refusal …show more content…
Rick Santorum, the former Pennsylvania Senator, suggests that he greatly respects Davis. The former governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee, was with Davis and her husband Joe as she was released from jail. Huckabee addresses that the arrest is not just an issue of politics, but it is a fight for Davis’s religious freedom (Blinder and Perez-Pena). Huckabee continues to keep up the fight for Davis and her religious liberty as he speaks to numerous crowds about the issue. Huckabee declares that people need to decide if they want to keep this great country or surrender it to tyranny and let the government overrule the people (Blinder and Perez-Pena). As Blinder describes it, Huckabee is just trying to grab the political spotlight for his presidential campaign. Although Huckabee is the only one mentioned trying to get attention, it is noticeable that other presidential candidates are doing the same thing by talking about intriguing information that would grab the audience’s attention. Davis’s case has started a spark in the media, and Davis wants it to be known that everyone deserves their religious freedom, no mater what they believe in. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas is also willing to make Davis’s situation known to the public. Cruz agrees that Davis’s arrest was an act of judicial tyranny and she deserves to have her freedom (Gabriel). Both Huckabee and Cruz’s statement