Korematsu

Words: 918
Pages: 4
Open Document
Over eighty years later, the Korematsu v the United States Supreme Court case again tested equality in America. During World War II, Executive Order 9066 was established. This order allowed for the military to separate the country into districts, supposedly for easier protection of citizens. However, Executive Order 9066 was exclusively discriminatory to Asian Americans, specifically those from Japan. Korematsu had received orders to leave his home in California to go to an internment camp, but several days later received orders to stay in his home. Not knowing what to do, Korematsu stayed in his home. Korematsu was charged with ignoring the federal orders. Korematsu argued that the orders were contradictory and that the United States should …show more content…
“He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures.. it must be determined that they should have the power to do this” (Justice Black, Majority Opinion, Korematsu v the United States). Justice Black declared that the military authorities feared another attack by the Japanese and therefore had the power to prevent this attack by any means necessary. This includes segregating certain groups of Americans. However, this was discriminatory because even though there maybe had been a few Japanese spies in America, not all Japanese Americans were spies, but they were treated as such. “And being an exercise of the war power explicitly granted by the Constitution for safeguarding the national life by prosecuting the war effectively, I find nothing in the Constitution which denies to Congress the power to enforce such a valid military order…” (Justice Frankfurter, Majority Opinion, Korematsu v the United States). Both Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter agree that the government is not wrong in discriminating against certain groups of Americans, but it is to protect against future …show more content…
“Being an obvious racial discrimination, the order deprives all those within its scope of the equal protection of the laws as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment” (Justice Murphy, Dissenting Opinion, Korematsu v the United States). The orders were in direct violation of the Fifth Amendment, which protects the accused from double jeopardy and self-incrimination and calls for due process. Korematsu and thousands of other Japanese Americans did not have the due process of law when they were forcibly taken from their homes. The United States military generalized the Japanese American population by declaring if one of them was a traitor, they all were and thereby had to be protected against. The verdict declaring Korematsu guilty is an example of how America’s equality has not evolved from when it first started with Dred
Show More

Related Documents: Korematsu

Fred Korematsu

On January 30, 1919, Fred Korematsu was born to Japanese parents in Oakland, California. He grew up in a small neighborhood with his parents and three brothers. They were no different from the average American family, except Fred’s parents were born in Japan. Where his parents were born was never much of a concern, but the events leading up to World War II would change America’s views on Japanese Americans (Category par. 2). After Fred Korematsu graduated from high school, he studied to be a welder…

Words 1476 - Pages 6

Fred Korematsu

In 1942, Fred Korematsu, an American born citizen of Japanese descent, refused to leave his home and be transported to an internment camp. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order No. 34 which ordered every American citizen of Japanese descent be removed from the west coast and placed in temporary camps as a matter of national security. Korematsu refused to leave his home and was subsequently arrested and stood trial for his actions. He was found…

Words 492 - Pages 2

Fred Korematsu: A Very Brief Summary

Around six years, these Japanese Americans were enforced to stay in these camps fearing for their lives while one was fighting for their right out. Fred Korematsu is a national civil right hero. At the age of twenty three, in nineteen forty two, he refused to go to the internment camps. Fred was arrested and convicted of disobeying government order. In court, he was able to appeal his case all the way to the supreme court. Although, in nineteen forty four, the Supreme Court had decided to rue against…

Words 494 - Pages 2

Comparing Odysseus And Fred Korematsu

they bear with superficial similarities, the differences between Odysseus from the “The Odyssey” by Homer, and Fred Korematsu is the way they handle their issues and problems. However they are heroes because they seek courage, make achievements, and is loyal to their people. Odysseus saves his warriors and he becomes a legend for the things he did to and from the Trojan war. Fred Korematsu in spite of that he refused to go to a internment camp because of his Japanese ancestry and fought for his equality…

Words 788 - Pages 4

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu v. United States Korematsu v. United States (1944) was a Supreme Court Case that dealt with the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066. This executive order was issued by President Franklin Roosevelt, and called that all Japanese Americans go into internment camps whether or not they were citizens. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese American who violated Executive Order 9066 by refusing to relocate during World War II. This court case ruled whether or not Executive Order 9066 was constitutional…

Words 460 - Pages 2

Hirabayashi Vs Korematsu Case Study

with the Japanese empire and the military fear of an invasion on the West Coast so it was believed that proper measures needed to be taken. Stone later goes on to talk about the 2 Supreme Court cases Hirabayashi and Korematsu. Just like in the Korematsu case, the Hirabayashi was also convicted. It was ruled that he was guilty of violating the curfews put up against minorities during war times. Both of the case rulings were declared constitutional by the court. The cross examination talked about fundamental…

Words 1174 - Pages 5

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

B. You are an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court in 1944. You have decided to uphold the appeal of Fred Korematsu in Korematsu v. United States. Give three reasons for your decision. I would like to speak on behalf of Fred Korematsu. I would like to uphold the appeal of Mr. Fred Korematsu. The Executive Order 9066 was passed due to the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Congress give the military proper authorization to execute the evacuation of anyone that poses a threat to the United…

Words 305 - Pages 2

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu V. US Fafard, Korematsu V. US (War Powers) Logan W. Fafard Liberty High School AP Government, 2A Korematsu v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case that contested the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, but more specifically Civilian Exclusion order no.34. This order is what forced Fred Korematsu to be moved away from his home and moved to the closest assembly center which is where all citizens of Japanese descent of the San Leandro area…

Words 491 - Pages 2

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

Korematsu v. United States 1944 6-3 Vote In the Korematsu v. United States case, a Japanese-American man by the name of Fred Korematsu challenged the ruling of the internment of the Japanese people after Pearl Harbor. Fred Korematsu opposed the presidential Executive Order 9066 and military statutes that gave power to the military to exclude Japanese citizens from areas that were believed to be important national defense areas that Japanese spies could leak information to the Military of Japan…

Words 420 - Pages 2

Case Study: Korematsu V. United States

United States is a Supreme Court case which held that the confinement of American citizens of the Japanese descent during the duration of World War II as constitutional. Korematsu is an American citizen of the Japanese decedents that refused to be kicked out of his own house and thrown into the internment camps, he was then convicted and appealed the lower court decision. When KvUS went through the supreme court the vote…

Words 881 - Pages 4