MLK Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 566
Pages: 3

We often think the most when something has affected us emotionally. MLK was a great leader due to his actions. He didn’t fight back with physicality but with passion. He didn’t inform but rather he connected with others. Through all of this he led the movement that will revolutionize the course of our nation forever. Which is why Dr. King uses pathos more often than logos and uses them much better. The argument to this would be informing the white majority of the problems that the nation faced. That the thought of their nation not progressing would certainly make them want to adjust. We have to remember though that these are in the dark times of racial inequality. As a child you were probably taught that blacks were not equal and even if your parents told you they were, society likely influenced you to not treat or think of them as “acceptable”. So simply enlightening those of the controversy would not trigger a domino affect in the zoo that was our society. …show more content…
MLK was that single person that lit the match. As he led the movement, the fire that was the desire for equality flourished into a forest fire of hope and success. Giving information tells someone about something, exploiting their emotions can make someone crave to do something. If you felt threatened wouldn’t you long to do something to feel gingerly? “...would be guaranteed the “unalienable Rights” of “Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.”(MLK).” Obviously though, with the whole slavery situation, the population didn’t care about all men having rights. What if though we brought their kids into this? What would happen if they pictured their kids in the daily struggles blacks faced? They would cry over this sight I feel like. “I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their