Monsters And The Moral Imagination Analysis

Words: 424
Pages: 2

As discussed in Stephen T. Asmas article, "Monsters and the Moral Imagination", he implies the dire need for such gruesome and horrific characters as a way to cope with real-life terrors. Which at first, brings numerous questions, like "how do we use monsters to cope with legitimate political issues? Why do we subconsciously do it?", "what terrors are we unknowingly coping with?", Asma explains the desire and use for such simplistic reasoning through his article.

Expressed on page 62, Asma determines that, "monsters can stand as symbols for human vulnerability and crisis", implying that we use the drastic instances of being chased by a psycho-maniac killer or ravenous beast to develop our own skills as to what we would do in those situations. I highly agree with Asma's theory, because when watching a fear-inflicting film, I do rationalize what I would do in those instances of life and death and find myself constantly judging the actors or actresses for not doing something that I would do personally. His familiar argument
…show more content…
Undoubtedly, proving how we think of those situations often and put ourselves through disturbing instances to interpret how we would handle those circumstances. Through Asma's article he constantly employs the idea of how monsters are simply symbols we use, but it also determines the context we use it in, since the word "monster" has numerous meanings and is associated in so many different ways. His theory is quite relatable, and reveals how society uses monsters not just for fun or fear but a way to psychologically cope with impending