Oath Of Supremacy Analysis

Words: 1608
Pages: 7
Open Document
The second way he ensured the plantations survival was he made sure the undertakers owed loyalty to him. James I required undertakers who were English or Scottish and Servitors of the kingdom of Ireland to swear the Oath of Supremacy which by reaffirmed the king as the supreme head of state. He also made sure that they “[conformed] themselves in religion according to his majesty’s laws.” Since James I was protestant, this mean that the undertakers would also have to be protestant. This was in contrast to the native Irishmen who are largely catholic. The Oath of Supremacy would have conflicted with the beliefs of the native Irish because due to their catholic back rounds, most of the native Irish would have believed that the Pope was supposed …show more content…
Some stipulations regulated when colonists had to practice: “twice a day upon the first Towling of the Bell shall upon the working daies repaire unto the Church” Some dictations were so highly religious that they went so far as to have inserted segments from the bible, such as this stipulation: “He that shall take an oath untruly, or beare false witnesse in any cause, or against any man whatsoever, shall be punished with death.” The stipulation took “beare false witneese” out of one of the Ten Commandments from the bible. The codes went so far as to judge how religious a person was. This was done sending people to the priest to “give up an account of his and their faith, and religion, and repaire unto the Minister” so that by confessing to him, the priest could then evaluate “whether heretofore they have beene sufficiently instructed, and catechised in the principles and grounds of Religion.” These practices enabled authorities to keep commoners under religious control. Similar to that of the king of England, Jamestown wished to regulate …show more content…
Lawes Divine, Morall and Martiall, Etc, there was also stipulations regarding authority. The codes forbid people to “give any disgracefull words, or commit any act to the disgrace of any person in this Colonie”. There were actually multiple parts which prevented people from talking negatively about, all different kinds aspects of the colony like authority figures: “No manner of person whatsoever, shall dare to detract, slaunder, calumniate… either against his Majesties honourable councell for this colony, resident in England…” It even went so far as to state that a person could not be negative towards “publique booke, or bookes, which by their mature advise, and grave wisedomes, shall be thought fit, to be set foorth and publisht, for the advancement of the good of this Colony” Jamestown also made sure that authority figures were obeyed by forbidding people to “ mutenie, resist, disobey, or neglect the commaundments of … any authorised Captaine, Commaunder or publike Officer.” The code went to great length to specify what could not be criticized. The results were that if a person could not open criticize some part of the colony, they would be less inclined to rebel against the
Show More

Related Documents: Oath Of Supremacy Analysis

Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief Summary

Case Brief of Marbury v. Madison Citation. 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803) Facts. In his very last days of office, President John Adams hurried to appoint several commissions, some of which were the justices of the peace for the District of Columbia. He rushed because he felt as if Thomas Jefferson would not appoint any Federalists and would instead appoint his own party, the Democratic Republicans. To prevent this, Adams appointed several “midnight judges”. These “last minute”…

Words 876 - Pages 4

The Rise of European Secularism in the 19th Century Essay

Constitution subordinated the church to the state, assuming the administrative role of paying the clergy, which effectively made them employees of the state, and not the Vatican. Clerical offices would now become elected positions which required swearing an oath of loyalty to the constitution.6 The sweeping constitutional reform of the Catholic Church was a devastating political blow to the power structure of the church. The Pope and the Vatican abhorred the proposed changes, and threatened priests with excommunication…

Words 1986 - Pages 8

Notes On Renaissance And Reformation

Unit 1: Renaissance and Reformation Classical Antiquity –Modern World – Post-Modern World * Greeks and Romans * Ended with the collapse of the western roman empire Medieval is French for the Middle Ages Intellectual movements 1350 was the bridge into the modern world Renaissance was a rebirth of going back to ancient Greece and Rome Choas of the 14th Century (not a good year) * War * Hundred years war * Conflict between France and England * Plague…

Words 3863 - Pages 16

Soviet Union and R.b Bennett Essay

Unit 1 Direct: Assassination of archduke Francis Fernandina of Austria - Hungary Indirect: Nationalism: The love for ones country. Imperialism : Extension of one nation control over their land. Militarism: The policy of building up weaponry. Alliance system: The partnership of countries against other. Schlieffen plan: Germany would face a war on two fronts. Germany wanted to avoid this at all costs. Germany planned to defeat France rapidly and then turn to the eastern front for a major offensive…

Words 3494 - Pages 14

United States V. Arizona Essay

Introduction 1 II. Perspective: Immigration, Discrimination, and Limitations on State Laws 3 III. Background: United States v. Arizona 9 A. S.B. 1070 and the Legislature’s Justification 10 B. The Decision: United States v. Arizona 18 IV. Analysis: S.B. 1070 is Preempted by Federal Immigration Law and Also Discriminatory 23 A. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Correctly found that S.B. 1070 is Preempted Because it Interferes with the Administration and Enforcement of Federal Immigration…

Words 14313 - Pages 58

Essay about Con Law Notes

Constitutional Law Where does FED or STATE legislature get its power? 1. Congress i. – if abused their powers. It is up to the court to interpret it (Marbury v. Madison) 1. They don’t have the power, because it is not enumerated. Our govt is a govt of enumerated powers, or 2. Power was exceeded 14th Amend. § 5 Kimmel Test to see if the Congress esceeded ii. If breached its limits. There are immunities and privileges of the people and if they pass a law that breaches it Amend 14th §1 then…

Words 8515 - Pages 35