Pros And Cons Of De-Extinction

Words: 602
Pages: 3
Open Document
De-extinction
Is bringing back the dead really necessary? Scientists should not bring extinct species back to life because if the species were resurrected, the creature would not be able survive in the world today. One reason, why scientist should not use de-extinction is because the resurrected animals would have a difficult time dealing with today enviroment. Also, by resurrecting the decrease species, the ecosystem might become unstable. Lastly, if scientist were to bring back the decrease creature then no one would pay attention to the upcoming endanger animals today.
Although, de-extinction would be interesting to see, one problems still lies, how would the species survive when restore to the modern world? For example, if scientists were to bring back the wooly mammoth, where would the mammoth live(Junior Scholastic 28)? As a matter of fact, the mammoth home has now been replace with forest and tundra(Junior Scholastic 28). Also, Brian Switek a writer from National Geographic has stated “To bring back a species that no longer has a place in this world …show more content…
For instance, if scientist were to resurrect Saber-toothed cat that hunted large animals like horses and camels, then the large animals would be in great danger(Junior Scholastic 28). Not to mention, Stuart Pimm a National Geographic writer, wrote “ De-extinction intends to resurrect single, charismatic species, yet millions of species are at risk of extinction.”(Pimm, A case Against Species Revival). Also, if the scientist want to put the revive species into the wild again then, the scientist would have to change the environment to meet the need of that animals, which will cause all the other animals to be endanger of habitat change.(Pimm, A case Against Species Revival). In other word, de-extinction not only causes chaos in the the ecosystem but also in the environment as
Show More

Related Documents: Pros And Cons Of De-Extinction

Essay On Cloning Extinct Animals

animals become extinct, the food chain gets affected. The animals above have to change what they prey on, while the animals below could grow exceedingly because they don’t have to worry about being eaten. It causes overpopulation as well as the extinction of other species. “The best reasons for bringing back extinct animals have more to do with ecology than tourism” (Sciencemag). The main reason for bringing back extinct animals is to help with ecology instead of for tourism purposes. “Re-introducing…

Words 1347 - Pages 6

Essay on My Nigga

Yevgeniy Grabovenko ENG 122 Professor Meixner Essay # 4 On The Pros and Cons of Globalization At the risk of stating the obvious, the world we live in has changed drastically over the last 500 years. From populations of basically homogenous people isolated in their respective countries with very little communication or travel, the advent of modern transportation, communication and trade has transformed the world into a closely knit global community which is growing closer by the minute. Cheap intercontinental…

Words 2526 - Pages 11

Essay on Tragedy of the Commons

What Shanl We Mam? Population, as Malthus said, naturally tends to grow "geometrically," or, as we would now say, exponentially. In a finite world this means that the per capita share of the world's goods must steadily decrease. Is ours a finite world? A fair defense can be put forward for the view that the world is infinite; or The population problem has no technical solution; that we do not know that it is not. But, it requires a fundamental extension in morality. in terms of the practical problems…

Words 6628 - Pages 27