Pros And Cons Of Unitary Executive Theory

Words: 509
Pages: 3

How much power is too much power one may ask? Power for what, who, when why, well let’s take a closer look and conduct research over the topic of Unitary Executive Theory (UET). The Unitary Executive Theory is a theory of American constitutional law holding that the President possesses the power to control the entire executive branch. So how much power would be too much power when allowing the President to make decisions. This theory was implemented by the Bust administration and was claimed to justify effectively unchecked presidential power over the use of military force, the detention and interrogation of prisoners and extraordinary rendition and intelligence gathering. Some agree and others disagree with this theory, lets look at what the …show more content…
Although those on the other side, “the Unitary Executive Theory has never been accepted as a valid interpretation of the Constitution by the Supreme Court, nor any federal court, the theory has been expressly rejected by the Supreme Court and other courts on a number of occasions” (Divoll). Those don’t like the idea of having to rely on all one source of power, as the President would reside over the entire branch. As it is stated that this theory has been reviewed and rejected multiple times so there are more than one flaw involved in this theory. As for one I would have to say that I do not support the Unitary Executive Theory or its propositions I would not want the president to have exclusive control over the executive branch and its members. I would consider that to be too much power and with no defined, exact and precise qualifications it’s not a trustworthy theory. In a current event congress passed a defense spending bill with controversial provisions authorizing the indefinite military detention, or rendering to a foreign country or entity, without charge or trial, of any person, including US citizens, detained, arrested, or captured anywhere in the world, including the