Revolutionary Dbq Analysis

Words: 1032
Pages: 5

History is constantly changing its viewpoints on certain topics, since very little records are found; these topics are only open to interpretation. However, everyone interprets things differently, but sometimes these interpretations can be taken overboard. There are famous misconceptions in history and things that one believes, but has no relying evidence to back it up. One in which, relies in the revolutionary war in 1773, when colonists fought hard for their independence against the British officials. Moreover, one can argue that the colonists were revolutionaries and the British were the conservatives, or vice versa. In terms, of the Revolutionary War, I firmly believe that the colonists were conservatives and the British were trying to …show more content…
Moreover, the first policy which was introduced was the Sugar Act of 1764, which was designed to increase revenue on items. It taxed items, such as molasses and sugar that were imported into the colonies. From this, the very infamous term, “no taxation without representation” came about, as the colonists felt they should not be taxed without one of their officials being apart of the parliament. Another act was the Stamp Act of 1765, where all paper documents, especially legal ones, such as birth certificates, death certificates, and marriage certificates, as well as playing cards, were taxed. The taxes increased prices and ultimately angered the colonists, as they were not being represented in congress and had no say in the matters. Moreover, the Quartering Act of 1765, played a big impact on the colonists attitude towards the British, because unwillingly the British placed troops into colonists home. By this, the colonists were, thus required to provide a place to sleep, eat, amongst other things. The colonists felt, that a man's home is his castle, and should not by any means be interrupted. To elaborate, all these policies and taxes, were only just another way the British tried to formally control the colonists, when in reality the colonists wanted to protect their status …show more content…
After, the Boston Tea Party, the British officials sought revenge, and unlike their other policies, they conferred more authority onto the policies in the Intolerable Acts. These acts were ultimately, the nail that broke the coffin and started the Revolutionary War. For example, in these intolerable acts there were four acts implemented. First, the Quartering Act of 1775, where british troops were placed in the homes of colonists. However, the more important acts were the Massachusetts Government Act and the Administration of Justice Act, all in which ultimately took away to the colonists fundamental rights. To specify, the Massachusetts Government act replaced Massachusetts elected council representatives with a council of royal appointees. Like most of these acts, it was designed to limit the independence of British. Secondly, the Administration of Justice Act, was by far the most cruel and unjust one implemented by the British. Consequently, this act was also called the “murder act”, for reasons pertaining to its name; it allowed the British to virtually get away with any crime. Ultimately, this angered the colonists, as again their rights were being blindly taken from them, with absolutely no warning, and of course no say in the matter. In conclusion, the intolerable acts were designed to take away colonists independence, however, with