Rwanda Genocide Essay

Words: 1278
Pages: 6

Before and during the colonial period, All Rwanda’s three groups lived in harmony for hundreds of years. Rwanda was dominated politically by the Tutsi, a social group comprising 17 percent of the population and less than one percent were Twa group. The rest of the population was Hutu. They share a common language and religions, and have intermarried. The term “tribe” or “ethnic group” has long been inappropriate to distinguish between these two main Rwandan groups. Nevertheless, the Rwanda killing of about 800,000 thousands people within 100 days was the failure of responsibility to protect vulnerable group of people. The purpose of this paper is to assess the Rwanda case based on the concept of responsibility to protect. Although the idea …show more content…
As the result of the agreement its implementation was closer but the president killed. The Hutu extremists those who opposed the power sharing agreement, started killing to Tutsi population and moderate Hutu population with a very high speed and brutality. At this stage the state was unable to protect civilians in the early stage of the crisis as well as failed to react when mass killing was started. Here is the failure of the international community both in charging its responsibility to protect and to react when the situation happened. As a report from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) indicated that the basic principles of responsibility to protect are the primary responsibility for the protection of people lies with the state itself, and the international responsibility to protect is appropriate when a state failure happen, and the state in question is unwilling or unable to halt or avert the harm on people. Therefore, the Rwanda case failed to satisfy these two basic principles. The state was failed and the international community did not intervene to stop that