Singer Solution To World Poverty

Words: 821
Pages: 4

Is it better to give or receive? This is a controversial question Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics, tackles in his article "The Singer Solution to World Poverty," which appeared in The New York Times Magazine. Singer believes that prosperous people should donate to overseas aid organizations all their money not needed for basic requirements of life such as the money spent on luxuries. There are third world countries whose citizens desperately need clean water to drink, substantial food to eat, and effective medicine to heal. Famine, TB, and many other diseases circulate struggling countries, which further affects their economy because too many people are sick or poor, which leads them without necessities they need in life. If a third …show more content…
Well, they start with an organization and it eventually grows into a successful business. Moreover, these people started from the bottom and persevered to their high position. Look at the Great Gatsby. Jay Gatsby, a character in the novel, came from a poor farm family. He first handedly experienced numerous struggles throughout his childhood. When Gatsby grew up, he created an image for himself. He established a future that he could live the rest of his life on because he was making a vast amount of money. Although his prosperity came from bootlegging, he pulled himself out of his slum portraying a perfect rag to riches story. It took strength, time, and smarts for Gatsby to get his portfolio of being prosperous, so why should people like him give back? These hard working people work a life to being someone famous off money. Why can't other countries do this as well? Life consists of choices and failing countries can make better choices without the helping hand of a hard working individuals. The weaker country would take a portion of the rich person's wealth, and that person's money would not be distributed back into the US currency; thus, causing inflation in the US. The helping the weaker nation would splinter the drive Americans need to push …show more content…
The most precious gift in the world. Third world countries across the globe suffer from poverty and sickness. Although receiving aid from prosperous people make that rich person's life harder, third world countries would benefit from it. Look at Haiti. Haiti is the most fractured country in the Western hemisphere. Haiti has suffered many natural disasters damaging the economy. Look at South Africa. About twenty-five percent of South African citizens are unemployed and the wide spread poverty is only increasing. Look at Uganda. Every year, roughly 100 thousand people die of malaria in Uganda. Uganda's struggling economy can only think of the disease infestation as a problem to think about tomorrow. These countries' governments cannot afford to pay off the damages due to nature or find jobs for their poor. Moreover, these countries cannot afford the medicine to help the sick within the country. They need aid. Assisting these third world countries would only be a penny in an affluent person's wallet. If these fortunate people do not donate aid overseas, then many will die. Life is valuable and short, but it will truly be long and lonely for Alex Sannoh, a fourteen-year-old boy who lost his parents to Ebola, Hindiya, a girl without any direct family members because they all died of famine, and Kethlen, a mother who did not have the money to feed her children. Wealthy people have the money to save lives. Not only that, wealthy people have the money to kick-start another