Stanislavski

Words: 628
Pages: 3

Brecht’s assumption that the Stanislavkian actor aimed for ‘complete conversion’ shows that he was unaware of Stanislavski’s stress on the need for multi-layered consciousness during performance. He also appeared to assume as defining characteristics of Stanislavski’s practice an uncritical espousal of Naturalism, and - absurdly - his use of Naturalism and empathy to deliberately dull the responses of audiences: ‘What he [Stanislavski] cared about was naturalness, and as a result everything in his theatre seemed far too natural for anyone to pause and go into it thoroughly. You don’t normally examine your own home or your own feeding habits, do you?’ (Willett, 1964: 237) and ‘The audience’s sharp eye frightens him [Stanislavski]. He shuts it’ (Ibid). Eric Bentley notes that ‘Such passages remind us that Brecht knew very little about Stanislavski [emphasis in the original] and, like the rest of the world, thought of him as the lackey of one style of theatre. If the word ‘Soviet’ does not define Stanislavski’s general outlook, neither do words like ‘naturalistic’ and ‘empathetic’ define his theatre as a whole.’ (Bentley, 1964-65: 73-4).