Stanley Milgram's Obedience Experiment

Words: 750
Pages: 3

This essay is about how Antigone would not follow through with Stanley Milgram's obedience experiment. Stanley Milgram's experiment, was when a “teacher”,a person who read materials in a specific order, was instructed to shock a “learner”,who was asked to repeat the materials the “teacher” said in the correct order, for every wrong order given, and if they did not answer they were shocked as well. The shock was not always the same voltage, for every wrong answer, the voltage would increase in increments of 15, until the maximum voltage of 450.Evidence strongly suggests, that if Antigone was the “teacher” in this situation that she would not continue to shock the person whom no longer is answering the questions in the time given. This evidence supports that Antigone was strong in her beliefs of unwritten law. Other evidence suggests that Antigone’s beliefs were not her only influences of not pressing the …show more content…
For example, she intentionally breaks the law, accepts her punishment, and doesn’t feel bad for what she did. Because, she does go against the normal gender role, one might assume that she could easily defy the experiment as well. Evidence states that Antigone “is not to be moved by the simple fact that the opinions of others might differ from her own”(McNeill 416). This defies Creon, the king, and by her doing this she is defying gender roles. The gender roles of this time suggest for women to sit back and not argue, and when Antigone decided to defy woman roles it supported that she would stand up for why they should not shock an unresponsive person or why they should not shock a person at all. Antigone’s initial decisions of defying Creon, the king,would suggest that she would not think twice to defy the experimenter. One might assume,Antigone would have no issue with choosing to stop the experiment, specifically because of how easily she defied the authority of