Supreme Court Case: Mcdonald V. Chicago

Words: 304
Pages: 2

The case McDonald v. Chicago was about if right of bear arm as found in District of Columbia v. Heller a fundamental right that applies to the states. Otis McDonald, Adam Orlov, Colleen Lawson, and David Lawson are Chicago residents who can't keep handguns in their home because of the Chicago's firearm law. Chicago petitioners argued that the handgun ban has left them vulnerable to criminals. Since the ban, handgun murder rate has actually increased to the highest murder rates in the country. The Supreme Court held that the Due process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment right recognized in Heller. The Court of appeal was revised and the case is remanded for further proceeding.
1. I don't think that gangs using guns in serious crimes should