The Importance Of Incriminating Evidence During The Civil War

Submitted By Aimee1025
Words: 555
Pages: 3
Open Document
Covering up embarrassing or incriminating evidence has taken its toll in the Civil War as well as during the Civil War. The Civil War was able to be delayed for a later time through these compromises. The outcome they did not want was war, so they would try to keep the Northerners and Southerners satisfied through the means of compromise; basically telling them what they wanted to hear. With the Missouri Compromise, Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Compromise of 1850, the war had been able to be postponed for years to come. The Missouri Compromise was actually triggered by the request to permit slavery, in Missouri and in the year of 1819. As a result the North was not was not satisfied with the compromise. Nevertheless the times leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions started to commence between anti-slavery and pro-slavery. This was because Maine had been taken out of Massachusetts and was entered as a free state. This would help even everything out once more, was the thought. After this compromise then the Louisiana Purchase amendment established; An Imaginary line was drawn and slavery would not be accepted north of that boundary. Except for Missouri, slavery would be allowed. So then at the time, the United States had twenty-two states that were evenly divided with the slave and the free. The amendment that kept that imaginary line intact, was what kept that boundary between free and slave regions until the Kansas Nebraska Act came along. The Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854 created the territories of the states Kansas and Nebraska. Which would open new lands for the settlement. And in hopes of encouraging the settlement, the senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that he organize the area west of Missouri into two separate but new territories; and these states were evidently Kansas and Nebraska. This proposal had triggered plenty of issues with the Southerners. This was because based on the Missouri Compromise; these new territories would then be join in on as Free states. As the end result of the Kansas-Nebraska act passed; it literally allowed slavery into areas where it was once not permitted
Show More

Related Documents: The Importance Of Incriminating Evidence During The Civil War

CAM RADCLIFFE EXPANSION DBQ Essay

But as Americans pushed West in hopes of territorial expansion, they encountered many problems. The North and South became increasingly belligerent towards each other specifically over the controversies of slavery. Due the nation annexing new lands, the status of slavery was on everyone’s minds. The Missouri Compromise which was supposed to settle this debate failed to prevent the conflict. So a dangerous crisis occurred. Although territorial expansion reflected the hopeful wishes of God…

Words 550 - Pages 3

Kansas Nebraska Act Research Paper

1854 stands as one of the pivotal moments leading to the Civil War, representing a break in the fragile peace brought forth by the Compromise of 1850. While the Compromise of 1850 aimed to lower tensions between the North and South by addressing territorial and slavery disputes, its effectiveness was short-lived and ultimately failed to resolve the underlying issues between the North and South. The admission of California as a free state and the implementation of the Fugitive Slave Act provided temporary…

Words 638 - Pages 3

Mexican American War Analysis

hungry citizens of the U.S. a plethora of territory that had no legislation regarding slavery. This forced some major decisions to be made, that didn’t sit well with a large number of the country. With Manifest Destiny as the driving force of this territorial and slavery expansion, Americans felt entitled to the area they were claiming and wanted it to be legislated like they desired. The disagreements between pro-slavery activists and abolitionists reached a new level at this point, as the fate of the…

Words 1217 - Pages 5

Compromise Of 1850: A Comparative Analysis

“During the 1850s, the controversy over the spread of slavery to the West froze America’s territorial expansion” (Shultz, 2014, p. 235). Southern Democrats were demanding that all new territories should allow slavery. The Northerners were saying that if the western territories were to allow slavery, the rich southern plantation owners would buy up all the new land. The Northern Democrats may have not been for slavery but they were definitely racist. The Northern Democrats were openly against…

Words 548 - Pages 3

Essay On Missouri Compromise

based on political favoritism, it affected the outcome on new territories. For instance, the sectional interests of the east - the North and South - reached new extremes as political actions between slave and free states in slavery. The Missouri Compromise became a the temporary resolved debate about slavery between the North and South, than conflict arose in the West about slavery. Although the West wanted their independence, they had to decide their political stance on their own than being trapped…

Words 492 - Pages 2

Manifest Destiny Case Study

product of American nationalism was ultimately responsible for the territorial expansion that led to the Civil War. Comment on this by analyzing the issues surrounding the question of slavery in the territories as they emerged in the 1840s and 1850s. Why was it so difficult to develop a lasting compromise on this question? By the mid nineteenth century slavery in America became more of a business long after the Missouri Compromise was passed where north of the line slaves were free as opposed to…

Words 743 - Pages 3

Dred Scott Vs Stanford Case Summary

master for five years in Illinois and Wisconsin Territory. Backed by interested abolitionists, he sued for freedom on the basis of his long residence on free soil. The Supreme Court proceeded to twist a simple legal case into a complex political issue. It ruled, not surprisingly, that Dred Scott was a black slave and not a citizen, and hence could not sue in federal courts. The tribunal could then have thrown out the case on these technical grounds alone. But a majority decided to go further, under…

Words 500 - Pages 2

To What Extent Was The Compromise Of 1850

legislative enactments, the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, will be taken into consideration in as much as to define the degree of the influence their passing had in the growth of the country’s division. It will be argued that though these legislations were initially aimed at appeasing the conflict between the two national forces, they in fact gave the country powerful incentives down the path to the Civil War. The Compromise of 1850 The Compromise of 1850 comprised five bills…

Words 766 - Pages 4

History Paper 2

was divided after the Northerners and Southerners failed to find a long-term, peaceful resolution over the issue of slavery. Though there were a few attempts to come to a formal decision on the dispute, most politicians avoided the topic of slavery since it was such a controversial subject. The few laws that were passed regarding the issue of slavery were not accepted as a fair compromise by citizens. They were often repealed and deemed unconstitutional. During the years of 1815-1861, the political…

Words 1087 - Pages 5

Lesson 3 practice quiz Essay

eruption of the Civil War in 1861. "By the 1850’s, the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord." This quotation suggests that A: vast differences of opinion existed over the issue of States rights Going back as far as the colonial era the northern and southern regions of America had differed greatly economically. The northern states were based mostly in manufacturing, trade and some agricultural production, while the southern…

Words 1314 - Pages 6