The Pros And Cons Of European Exploration

Words: 386
Pages: 2

The Europeans only explored new lands for Gold, God, and Glory which were the 3 G’s! The Age of Exploration was in which Europeans explored new lands, and there were positives and there were also negatives that came with it. European Exploration was worth the costs because if this never happened, then we would not be in the world that we live in right now. European Exploration found most of the stuff that we have and use today, without it, we probably wouldn’t survive.
Crops were imported. The reason that there is to support this is in the PowerPoint there was, it said that there were crops. Also in the PowerPoint, it said that their were trade routes, old and new. The last piece of evidence that there is to support that crops were imported were that there were new ideas, and that is all the evidence that there is to support why crops were imported from Europe to the America’s.
…show more content…
The evidence to support this is Europeans could use the animals to ride, because there weren’t any cars back then. Another piece of evidence to support transporting animals to Europe is Europeans could have used those animals for clothing such as making a fur coat out of a bear’s skin, or something similar to a bear. The last piece of evidence is, animals could have been used for food, like pigs could have been bacon, cows could have been steak, and squirrels could have been used for squirrel soup.
The last reason why the Age of Exploration was worth the costs is people became smarter. The evidence to support this is new and better improved technology. The other piece of evidence to support this is better trade routes, and people only used the new trade routes, not the old. The last reason is animals went from America to Europe, and Europe to