The Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

Words: 614
Pages: 3

As Robert kennedy once said. “The glory of justice and the majesty of law are created not just by the Constitution - nor by the courts - nor by the officers of the law - nor by the lawyers - but by the men and women who constitute our society - who are the protectors of the law as they are themselves protected by the law.The Constitution had some positive and negative sides. Did you also know that two founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, did not sign the Constitution? There are many reasons that some states wanted to ratify the Constitution and some states wanted to dismiss the Constitution and stick to the way it was before ratifying the Constitution had it ups and downs which affect us in both positive and negative ways. The way you look at it is what decides whether the constitution was a good or bad document. The ideas may support you or go …show more content…
Most people thought that if the Constitution was ratified, that the common folk would lose power. They thought that the government would take all the power, which was what people were treated like in Germany. This belief was what led people thinking that the Constitution was a bad idea. We know how the Constitution was a bad idea because it took away people's freedom. Let us look at some positive outcomes that came with ratifying the Constitution. One reason it was good was that before the Constitution that ruled the government of the USA was falling apart and that the tension among the people grew across the land. As the owner of a newspaper put it, ”the melancholy faces of our working people...our ships rotting..the insults that are offered to the American name.” This idea of a Constitution sparked a piece of hope in people's mind. There was no order to keep together the people of the USA without it. Many people saw this as an opportunity for the US to grow. These reasons show that the Constitution was a good idea to keep the law and