Things They Carried Rhetorical Analysis

Words: 851
Pages: 4

O’Brien’s ability to convey the real feelings and emotions that war evokes in people is a testament to his skill as a writer. The Things They Carried is a very well-written book, but it’s not 100% accurate. If he’s not always telling the truth, how do we know what war looks like? O’Brien’s style is very jumpy. He jumps from one subject to another, from time to time, from detail to detail. He wrote this book very well. He went into a lot of detail about the scenarios so that we could understand what was going on. But he can’t seem to stay on topic very well. Most people wouldn’t like this style. But I like it. I like the inconsistency of the sand. It keeps me interested in what’s going on instead of getting me bored with it too fast. For example, …show more content…
The ending was reasonable and well-written, but I wish it had revealed more about him, his current situation, and the effects the war had on him after it ended. The Things They Carried, written by Tim O'Brien, is a convincing variety of connected stories that dive into the encounters of American troopers during the Vietnam War. The book investigates the physical and profound importance shared by fighters, the intricacy of truth in narrating, and the enduring effects of battle on people. O'Brien creates an impactful story that resonates with perusers long after the final page. At its core, The Things They Carried is about the heaviness of war, both exacting and allegorical. O'Brien strikingly portrays the substantial things conveyed by troopers, like weapons, stuff, and individual keepsakes. These actual items act as tokens of the risks they face and the friends and family they abandon. Nonetheless, the weights stretch out past the material domain. Each fighter likewise conveys the heaviness of dread, guilt, and injury. These undetectable weights are comparably heavy, while possibly not all the more in this way, than the actual ones, shaping their considerations and activities all through the