Argumentative Essay About Banned Books

Words: 2255
Pages: 10
Open Document
As Laurie Anderson puts it in her book Speak, “Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance (“Quotes About Banned Books”).” Censorship is when something such as a book or movie is examined and then supressed. Parts of it may be suppressed while sometimes the piece as a whole is suppressed. Banning is a form of censorship. Banning is the action of prohibiting something usually from the public eye. People have typically banned books and other forms of media due to them finding something offensive in the content while others are afraid of the ideas some of them contain. Some people say this is an infringement on a citizen’s first amendment rights. Others believe that only parents should have a say in what their children can read …show more content…
After writing a book called Boy Toy about a 18 year old boy who deals with the memories of being sexually abused by a teacher when he was only twelve and later has to deal with the same teacher getting out of jail early, Barry was expecting some backlash. He received none. Instead, he received glowing reviews from librarians and magazines, but the sales of the book seemed ridiculously low for such a well liked book. That’s where self censorship comes in. Apparently librarians loved the book, but did not recommend it for students and therefore didn't buy it and put it on their shelves. Bookstores also played a part in the self censorship. Some of them did not carry the book at all while others put the book in the adult section of the store. As Barry Lyga himself described it, “It’s sort of a soft, quiet, very insidious censorship, where nobody is raising a stink, nobody is complaining, nobody is burning books. They’re just quietly making sure it doesn’t get out there (Whelan).” Self censorship is a silent form of censorship that goes unnoticed. It also raises the question of whether or not librarians should be allowed to let their own personal opinions affect what books they let into the
Show More

Related Documents: Argumentative Essay About Banned Books

Banned Book Argumentative Analysis

Banned Book Argumentative Analysis To begin, the purpose of Banned Book Week is to celebrate the freedom to read and express ideas. Banned Book Week is normally celebrated the last week of September. During this time the whole book community gathers to focuses are value to freely access information, and support our freedom into access information. The two books I am using in this essay are Speak and The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. Furthermore, two books that should not be banned…

Words 837 - Pages 4

Untitled Document Alyssa Tapia Essay

Argumentative Essay Assignment Name:Tapia,Alyssa Class:Per.1 ELA 2/24/15 I truthfully believe that philip's rights were violated when humming the star spangled banner, he should have not been banned from humming because this related back to the free expression rights which means that the government does not have the rights to forbid people from saying what they would like to or want to say, V.S. from saying what would like to say at all times. My argument to this is t…

Words 689 - Pages 3

Example Research: Critical Discourse Analysis Essay

18 Critical Discourse Analysis TEUN A. VAN DIJK 0 Introduction: What Is Critical Discourse Analysis? Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a type of discourse analytical research that primarily studies the way social power abuse, dominance, and inequality are enacted, reproduced, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. With such dissident research, critical discourse analysts take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality…

Words 9518 - Pages 39