Civil Rights Case Summary

Words: 1565
Pages: 7
Open Document
Another case of a hate crime being committed by a white supremacist is the Overland Park Jewish Community Campus shooting in April of 2014 (Stucker & Shoichet, 2014) (Global Terrorism Database, 2016) (“Kansas Shooting”, 2014). An anti-Semitic man arrived at the Overland Park Jewish Community Campus and killed an elderly man and the man's grandson who were visiting; though this was assumed to be a hate crime, meant to end the life of two Jewish people, both victims were actually of the Christian faith. The shooter was a leader of a North Carolina based section of the KKK. He was also a very well-known anti-Semitic, running for Congressional office twice, though not being elected, and often posted to a forum online that called for the extermination …show more content…
Federally supported segregation was a thing of the past, though “race mixing” was still not okay with some citizens. This was the issue in the case of a man shooting and killing two African American men jogging with two white women (“Avowed Racist Is Convicted”, 1981) (Global Terrorism Database, 2016). Along with the death of the two men, one of the white women was injured by a bullet fragment. The shooter’s defense was that he was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, however, the man was said to have been lying in wait in a field for a few hours before the time of the shooting. The man was an avowed racist and although the evidence that got his conviction was circumstantial, it was enough for the jury to determine his guilt. On federal charges, the shooter was charged with depriving the civil rights of the two men killed; he did this by denying them the ability to be in the park by taking their life. The man was sentenced to two consecutive life terms. The shooter was also charged with a handful of other murders, including the killing of black man and white woman in 1979, and with the murder of two black men in 1980. He was also suspected to have been the shooter in the Vernon E. Jordan Jr. Shooting case. The shooter actually confessed to around 10 major crimes (including homicide and attempted homicide), and the shooting of …show more content…
They have already been discussed in this paper, however, it is important to note that they are more than just people committing crimes that do not directly harm another person. The Ku Klux Klan is a group of white men that promote the spread of hate and white supremacy and often share ties with Neo-Nazis. In 1980, two members of the Ku Klux Klan in Chattanooga, Tennessee were acquitted after shooting at a group of people and injuring four African-American women aged 50 to 74 (“Klansman Convicted”, 1980) (Global Terrorism Database, 2016) (“MLK Shootings”, n.d.). There were three men in the truck at the time, and the only man charged was the one who actually shot the shotgun out of the window. That man received 20 months in prison and was fined $225. Despite the men being obvious members of the KKK, and one man being the Imperial Wizard, only one man was convicted. The jury was made up entirely of white people. The men claimed to be shooting to bring notice to some crosses they had set fire to in a predominantly black community, however, they also said they were shooting into a crowd of people indiscriminately. The excuses made were not ones that should have been accepted, but they were when brought before a jury. The fact that the men were able to get away with aiding someone in shooting someone is not something that is right or fair or just. It is also unreasonable that their excuse was
Show More

Related Documents: Civil Rights Case Summary

Commerce Law And Society Glossary

Commerce Law and Society Glossary • Civil Laws: The body of laws established by a state or nation for its own regulation • Court: A body of people presided over by a judge, judges, or magistrate, and acting as a tribunal in civil and criminal cases. • Defendant: An individual, company, or institution sued or accused in a court of law. • Jurisdiction: The official power to make legal decisions and judgements. • Precedent: An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered…

Words 507 - Pages 3

Task 1 Human Resources Memo Essay examples

a hostile environment. In order to justify a claim of constructive discharge, it is common for the former employee to prove that he or her was subject to sexually harassment or discrimination based on sex, religion, age, or national origin. In this case, the former employee is making a claim that discrimination occurred based on religion, due to the enforcement of the new production schedule. The new production schedule required all employees to work on alternating weekends, which includes holy days…

Words 880 - Pages 4

Wards Cove Packing Co. V. Atonio Case Analysis

the Civil Rights Act of 1991 into law. This act, which was in response to a series of controversial Supreme Court rulings, was designed to “amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to strengthen and improve Federal civil rights laws, to provide for damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination, to clarify provisions regarding disparate impact actions, and for other purposes.” (S. 1745, 102nd Cong.) Essentially, it targeted policy in employment discrimination cases and “provided the right to…

Words 1418 - Pages 6

Essay Unit 12 Cornell Notes Chapters 29 and 30 MARGARET TEBBE

Unit 12: Civil Rights and Vietnam Chapter 29.1: Taking on Segregation KEY TERMS Brown v. Board of Education NOTE TAKING AREA ● In this case, the father of eight­year­old Linda Brown had charged the board of education of Topeka, Kansas, with violating Linda’s rights by denying her admission to an all­white elementary school four blocks from her house. The nearest all­black elementary school was 21 blocks away. ● In a landmark verdict the Supreme Court struck down school segregation as a slam on the 14th…

Words 3242 - Pages 13

Business: Law and Common Law Doctrines Essay

1. What two essential elements comprise traditional criminal liability? What are 3 primary differences between civil and criminal court? - 3 primary differences between civil and criminal court are PURPOSE, WHO CAN FILE, AND BURDEN OF PROOF. - Two essential elements that comprise traditional criminal liability are committing a bad act and intent to do a bad act. Certain acts don’t require intent, such as manslaughter and criminal negligence. 2. List 6 categories of crime and give examples…

Words 796 - Pages 4

Essay HIS 301 Week 2 Summary

In this pack of HIS 301 Week 2 Summary you will find the next information: What was the government's role in permitting, then forbidding slavery and in the Civil Rights movement, both in legislation and in famous Supreme Court cases throughout our nation's history? History - US Culture and History Resources: American History , Primary Source Investigator Complete the following sections of the America and the World Presentation: · 2 to 3 slides:Summary of how international…

Words 418 - Pages 2

Essay on The Adversary System

win the case. There are strict rules of procedure that must be followed and the judge and the jury are impartial arbitrators. 2. In the adversary system each party has control of their own case. This is known as party control, where they get to decide how evidence is presented, providing the rules of evidence and procedure are followed, and they get to prepare their own case and present it. In the adversary system, parties are responsible for instigating proceedings. In a civil case the plaintiff…

Words 643 - Pages 3

Title VII Constructive Discharge Claim ( Essay

against the company alleging “Constructive Discharge under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” Under Title VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964, employees in the US are protected in the workplace from discrimination based on race, color, ethnicity, gender or religion. Title VII also prohibits employment discrimination based on association with any race, color, ethnicity, gender or religion (The Civil Rights Act of 1964, 2013). The issue that we are facing alleging constructive discharge…

Words 1822 - Pages 8

State of Confusion Essay example

confusion is constitutional or not, describe what provisions of the U.S. Constitution will be applied, and conclude with if Tanya will likely prevail on the lawsuit. The court that should have jurisdiction over Tanya case is the federal jurisdiction. Most federal courts could decide on a case such as Tanya on the lawsuit and my not have partial opinions on the matter. “Federal Court may decide in the language of the constitution controversies between a state and citizen of another state” (Lectric, Law…

Words 819 - Pages 4

Essay about High Court of Justice and Court

The Civil Courts 1. County Court There are about 230 county courts most of which are in major towns. Cases are heard by a District or Circuit judge. They mainly deal with: Small Claims Track Cases (less than £5000) Cases of Contract and Tort Disputes over partnerships, trusts & inheritance (up to value of £30,000) All cases for the recovery of land. On a rare occasion the judge may sit with a jury of 8 to hear cases of: * Defamation *False imprisonment * malicious prosecution 2. High Court The…

Words 900 - Pages 4