Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

Words: 246
Pages: 1
Open Document
“The Perils of Indifference” is extremely well thought out and well executed. Elie Wiesel is constantly shifting ideas while tying them together with valid irrefutable evidence, even his own personal experiences to create a very clear message. He begins his speech with a memory of when he was a young boy, calling out the infamy of his homeland. At the start of the second paragraph he says; “And now, I stand before you” making a fantastic reveal that he was talking about himself, therefore connecting with the audience and gaining their trust, for all of his words are said with astounding conviction. What drives this speech on is that every single piece of his speech has its own purpose and is backed up with evidence to further get his point
Show More

Related Documents: Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

Loren Vagts Professor Anne Kennedy English 102 24 August 2017 Elie Wiesel “The Perils of Indifference” Elie Wiesel accurately uses pathos in his speech about indifference to clearly express his message to his audience. Wiesel is successful in his use of pathos to deliver the speech about indifference. There are many examples of this in his speech and they will be critically evaluated to prove his successful use of pathos. The first example of his use of pathos is in his opening statement. Take…

Words 757 - Pages 4

Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

On April 12, 1999, Elie Wiesel delivered a poignant speech during the Millennium Lectures. (Wiesel 1) Throughout Wiesel’s speech, the word “indifference” is heavily emphasized while establishing connections between the past and the present – contrasting what we, as a country, have done and what we should do going forward. “The Perils of Indifference” is a powerful plea to the American government and people to defend human life in the new millennium. Wiesel captures his audience with facts, appeals…

Words 761 - Pages 4

Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference

In the Millennium Lecture Series speech “Perils of Indifference”(1999), Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and Nobel Laureate, accentuates that indifference is dangerous encouraging the oppressor making it to be the “friend of the enemy” (Wiesel 12), prolonging the existence of human suffering instead of ending it. He supports this claim when he exemplifies on how Franklin D. Roosevelt could have intervened when America’s largest corporations were doing business with Germany which which resulted with…

Words 142 - Pages 1

Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

Indifference is tempting. Indifference is suffering of the victims. Indifference is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Indifference is seductive. Indifference is a blurred line between light and darkness. Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, implies the dangers of indifference. He develops his claim by first defining the lack of interest as being a “strange” and “unnatural” subject which goes their blurred lines in between light and darkness, then Wiesel defines…

Words 950 - Pages 4

Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

In 1999, former Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel gives his speech, The Perils of Indifference, as a way to start a new millennium in front of President Clinton, the First lady, and other white house leaders. In Wiesel’s speech, he defines the beauty of indifference by portraying tragic events that has happened while he was trapped in World War II as a young boy. He develops his speech by sharing his own personal experience and facts from that history to gain credibility, structures his bodies with…

Words 181 - Pages 1

Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

focussed on the view of hopelessness when it is a life or death situation and this makes the impactful literary piece less skilled in seeing the loss of hope in situations of less or more impact. “The Perils of Indifference” immerses the reader into a world of complex and guilt creating indifference from the faults of the US when the Holocaust first began. Night gives the reader an idea of the horrors of giving into hopelessness and turning into an inhuman blob floating through death believing you…

Words 383 - Pages 2

Elie Wiesel's Speech: The Perils Of Indifference

World War 2 was a tragedy for everyone and it will always be remembered. On April 12, 1999 Elie Wiesel gave a speech at the White House known as “The Perils of Indifference.” The speech was hosted by President Bill and Hillary Clinton.He has received multiple rewards including the Nobel Peace Prize in 1896. Wiesel has written over 40 books about his experiences in the holocaust(The History Place). .Elie Wiesel made sure to use pathos multiple times in his speech to get people to understand that…

Words 419 - Pages 2

Summary Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

Elie Wiesel does a good job ordering his ideas into his work “The Perils of Indifference.” By starting his speech with his story, but being told in a third-person point-of-view, he is setting up the story and giving up background information to the audience listening. Starting this way it helps set up the main idea of what he is trying to say and give background information on the subject. He continues to address the president. He thanks the first lady for the stands that she has been doing. By…

Words 372 - Pages 2

The Perils Of Indifference Essay

Author and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference means death. He supports his claim by defining indifference as dangerous, inhuman, and a friend of the enemy. While also using emotionally loaded imagery and diction. Examples of this are the list of humanity’s “failures” and the references to his life during the Holocaust. Wiesel’s purpose is to emphasize indifference and its’ consequences to the people so that they acknowledge the horrors…

Words 704 - Pages 3

Perils Of Indifference

“The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, and “On Women’s Right to Vote” by Susan B. Anthony are two speeches about human rights, which share similarities and differences. These speeches were incredibly powerful. Each author made the public aware of human rights issues, which forever changed our lives. In order to study these speeches, it is necessary to examine each author. Elie Wiesel was a holocaust survivor and later became a political activist. Susan B. Anthony was a social reformer who…

Words 645 - Pages 3