Explain The Types Of People In The House Of Commons And House Of Lords

Words: 665
Pages: 3

1. Identify – explain the types of people in the House of Commons and House of Lords.

There are different types of people in the House of Commons and House of Lords. The British Parliament of the eighteenth century was controlled by a landed aristocracy that historians usually divide into two groups. The landed gentry sat in the House of Commons, and served as the judges of the peace in the counties, but the peers stayed for life in the House of Lords. Also, there is a lot of historical discussions on whether it makes sense to differentiate between the upper classes because the two groups had a lot of things in common. Both groups were landowners with much of the same economic interests, and they frequently intermarried.

2. How did the foreign
…show more content…
Walpole was the prime minister from 1721 to 1742 and he achieved a tranquil foreign policy to avoid new land taxes. However, developing trade and industry in Britain in the eighteenth century led to the ever-increasing middle class to approve of the expansion of trade and world empire. The supporters of the empire found William Pitt the Elder as a good spokesman, he became the prime minister in 1757 and promoted imperial aspiration by obtaining Canada and India in the Seven Years’ War.

3. What were Frederick William’s General Directory’s responsibilities?

Frederick William’s General Directory had many important responsibilities. Frederick William I (1713-1740) advocated the evolution of Prussia’s greatly efficient civil government by initiating the General Directory. Also, it served as the chief executive representative of the central government, financial affairs, economic, police, and supervising military. This was because Prussia’s disorganized regions could hardly have been protected without a good focused bureaucratic machine. These things were the most significant responsibilities of Frederick William’s General Directory’s responsibilities.

4. How does Prussian militarism reflect Prussian