Eyewitness Testimony

Words: 618
Pages: 3

On many occasions, eyewitness accounts have been proven decisive in court for both defense and prosecution, and while these people are integral to the justice process, they are not impervious to fault. There is a significant growing body of research regarding the credibility of eyewitnesses and it can be recommended that principal players utilize caution. Researchers have been citing the failures of the human memory and producing studies, which have suggested that when witnesses are faced with significant factors, such as the interrogation method, that their reliability can be called into question. Some problematic issues that have been uncovered involve the length of time after which eyewitnesses recall the events surrounding a crime, factors involving peer pressure, and psychological factors that affect the accuracy of human memory. In addition to these factors, the credibility of witness accounts have also been marred by the marked mistakes that have occurred in past eyewitness testimonies, which have been used to wrongly convict innocent people. It is evident that information given by eyewitness accounts can be unreliable to the extent exemplified, and it is vital that jurors and judges exercise caution and restraint when considering eyewitness accounts based on past statistics and the fallibility …show more content…
Take for example the case of Kirk Bloodsworth who was accused of raping and murdering a nine-year-old girl in 1984. Following the court’s decision, Bloodsworth was regrettably condemned to the gas chamber. The decision of the court was influenced by various flawed testimonies provided by the eyewitness accounts of five people. (Arkowitz and Lilienfeld, 2009). Kirk Bloodsworth had to spend an inescapable nine years in incarceration before the DNA test proved that he was innocent. Clearly, it is important that the justice system does not base its final verdict merely on the testimony of