Houston Leadership

Words: 475
Pages: 2

When Houston ended his Presidency for the second time, he did not retire as most would have. He simply began his law practice again, establishing a partnership with John Birdsall in Houston. Although Houston enjoyed law, his plans were nonetheless changed once again, when on December 29, 1845 Texas was admitted to the United States. With this union, Houston became one of the two Texas senators. Houston would go on to serve from 1846 until 1859, once again proving that the people of Texas trusted his leadership. In 1857, Houston ran for governor of Texas, but was defeated by Hardin R. Runnels. Once done with his service in the Senate, Houston again ran for governor of Texas in 1859, and this time was victorious over Runnels. During this time, Houston was also nominated for President of the United States, but lost out on the nomination. …show more content…
Houston “warned Texas that civil war would result in a Northern victory and destruction of the South, a prophecy that was borne out by future events” During these tumultuous times, Houston continued to prove that he had the qualities of a true leader, as when Texas did succeed, Houston “acquiesced to these events rather than bring civil strife and bloodshed to his beloved state” However, Houston also stuck to his beliefs, and was thus removed from office. Although Lincoln offered Houston the use of troops in order to keep him in office, Houston declined in an attempt to prevent violence. Instead, Houston once again chose exile. These series of events proved that Houston was a leader who would attempt to keep peace, but would also stand firm to his beliefs, even if this meant the loss of power. This willingness to lose power when necessary is one of the characteristics that made Houston a strong