How Did Gandhi Use Non Violence

Words: 1165
Pages: 5

Gandhi once said, "Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man."
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi uses nonviolent measures to speak his voice. and destruction comes from those with little patience and understanding. Gandhi believed nonviolence was a force stronger than any other to counter any obstacle that comes your way; he thought of it as fighting for justice by not fighting at all. Man can create any weapon he wants, but that weapon won’t stand a chance competed with nonviolence. By adopting nonviolent methods, one can achieve what they want without causing damage or harm to others. This was very important to Gandhi. The Satyagraha is
…show more content…
Since Gandhi and his Satyagraha participants, the Satyagrahis, choose this form of defense against the high taxes, they non-violently took action to persuade the British to see their point of view instead of forcing them to oppression. Thus, this led Gandhi to lead an act of civil disobedience known as The Salt March, in 1930. Even though the march ended in the arrests of nearly fifty thousand people, including Gandhi, India was finally granted its independence in 1947. When Gandhi was arrested, his son, along with Gandhi’s followers, continued the protest at a British run salt factory in hopes to shut it down. As the protestors continued, nearly four hundred policemen fought back against them and the protestors battled back with non violent resistance. This event was shared globally throughout newspapers and made the British officers look like destructive murderers and the Indians look like progressive saints. To put an end to the salt taxation, Gandhi signed a contract with the viceroy Lord Irwin, which released one hundred thousand prisoners and allowed the Indians to make salt. From this lesson in history, the Satyagraha was quite successful. It didn’t reduce the tax on salt, nor did it give India its independence yet, however, it did make the British appear cruel to the world. Even though this was the start of the Satyagraha, many more people had their opinions about its