John Locke Research Paper

Words: 1036
Pages: 5

In the liberal theory of justices, John Locke contractor from the theory of libertarianism, and Immanuel Kant argued that our action has more worth if the precisely our capacity by rising above self-interest and inclination and to act out of duty, while John Rawle argue that theory of justice as fares is what describes a society in which all citizen holds equal basic right and liberties in order to cooperation with in an egalitarian economics system.

The basic principle of liberal theory of justice by John Locke is that, in the “state of nature”. Before any political structure has been established, all mankind has certain natural rights to life, liberty and property. His belief is that, everyone as individual have an unalienable right
…show more content…
Even nobody ever acts out of true motives, there is still a difference between right and wrong, and there also different between motivation and morality. He believes that reason and maxim adopted for oneself, being followed objective which refer to necessary for individual. His idea is that the system of morality is equal to the decision rule plus valid maxims moral law, and by decision rule he meant the different ways of getting the same answer to weather or not a possible maxim is true. His belief is that telling some sort of lie, is a contravenes of one’s own dignity by using the theory of hypothetical to make a point of misleading truth. And that leads to Kant’s theory of morality in which we as a people relate to God, and that should make us bearer the truth. Rather it is the maximum to reason and choose freely to make us unique and sets us apart from mere animal. We are acting our ways out of duty doing something right because it is right only then do our actions have moral worth when he quote ( “Surely, some may object, principle should be chosen in a light of all the knowledge available.) His theory of morally allow for no