Karl Marx Poverty

Words: 968
Pages: 4

While Karl Marx has the right idea for assisting those who are in poverty, he has a detrimental and damaging process for solving the issue of poverty and the wrong idea of what the root cause is. Philosophers must not debate these processes, but act upon them. Philosophers are constantly debating the ideas of Marx, but never truly testing them in the real world. Socialism is an extreme action to the problems that need solving. Not everyone needs to live on the same level in order to keep the poor out of poverty. Socialism cuts off any chance of improvement. The system leaves everyone in the dirt, struggling to fend for his or her own survival.
The differences in finances helps create healthy competition in a capitalistic society. These competitive
…show more content…
Those who base their worldviews on a humanistic society have the task of overthrowing society and restarting, while those with a belief in absolute truth recognize the folly of trying to rebuild the system and instead advocate fixing the few issues that are there. The church and limited but directed application of the government can accomplish this. The people should always keep the government separate from society, as the duality of the separation keeps those in authority to preserve justice while allowing the general people to have free will. The preservation of justice should be the only task for the government, not for the task of helping those in poverty. Marx advocates for every government to follow his ideas and obliterate the borders, while disregarding the difference between the different nations. Often the difference is enough to cause tension between the nation-states. Each government should follow the same changes, though. Beginning with a mandated rest every week and support for those who are unable to work any longer, all governments should allow the labour unions to operate outside of their business’ sphere of influence. The governments should not try controlling the finances through a nationalized bank or try to nationalize the means of production in order to allow the needy to succeed. By doing this, the government creates a need of dependence. As the people start to depend on the government, the government cannot be violently overthrown, but must slowly change the environment in order to care for the wellbeing of the people. These two ideas of Marx conflict with each other. This demonstrates one of the problems of the approach of