Lo4 Unit 4 Assignment 1

Words: 3528
Pages: 15

Module 4 Assignment 4 Learning outcomes.

LO4: Create a work breakdown structure.

LO5: Assess project risks according to their likelihood and degree of impact. Name: Itumeleng Keketsi - 1. Instructions and guidelines (Read carefully) Instructions 1. Insert your full name and surname in the space provided above. Save the file as: Initials_Surname_A4 – e.g. L_Smith_A4. NB: Please ensure that you use the name that appears on your student profile on the Online Campus (OLC). 2. What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? Write all your answers in this document. There is an instruction that says, “Start writing here:” under each question. Please type your answer on the line immediately below this prompt or, if there is a numbered list
…show more content…
Be sure to discuss specific benefits and not merely the distinguishing features of each method. Your answer must be relevant to the scenario. Max. 3. Start writing here: Process-oriented method helps provide a clear outline of the project’s phases and defines dependencies of/between deliverables, making it easy to track project progress. c) To demonstrate to Louise a practical example of the relative advantages of each WBS method over the other, you introduce an example unrelated to the LES programme. You have recently acquired a new property, and you want to build a greenhouse in your backyard. Explain to Louise why you would choose the WBS method you identified in Question 1.5 (a). Be sure to describe the specific advantages of this method over the process-oriented method for building your greenhouse, i.e. don’t discuss merely the distinguishing features, which should have already been stated in column two of your answer to Question 1.5 (a). Max. 3 lines) Start writing here: The product-oriented method would be beneficial because it depends on products to complete, for example, the structure of the greenhouse, and ventilation system. It approaches the project in an orderly manner to get to completion. Scenario (Part 2b) We’re now in the last week of February 2017 and we’ve encountered several bumps along the road, some major and others a bit less stressful. Our programme schedule showed that we had a comfortable one-month gap between our original forecast delivery end date and the contractual deadline for delivery of 30 November 2017. However, the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) informed us today that payment of their first instalment might be two weeks later than the expected date in mid-March. Remember that our funding agreement states that we can only start implementing units in the community once we’ve received DTI’s first