Mongols Dbq Analysis

Words: 640
Pages: 3
Open Document
Throughout history, the Mongols have had several opinions that were formulated from others due to experience and interaction towards them. Some may say the Mongols had a successful, luxurious, and organized empire while others will concluded the Mongols as bloodthirsty, brutal, and violent individuals that destroyed lives. There are several primary sources that express the opinions towards the Mongols and what caused to see the Mongols as that. As previously said, the Mongols were seen in a negative light to some which is agreeable. In the primary source written by Genghis Khan’s shaman (Document 1), he said that before Genghis was born, the Mongols had murderous and cruel towards one another. It was also said that the Mongols and their conflicts …show more content…
A factor that pushed their point of view was their extravagant court of Great Khan. The Great Khan’s court was had constant visits from well-respected individuals like friars and missionaries. In a primary source written by William of Rubruck, a French friar who spent several months at the palace, he descriptively describes the upscale and grand living space. The Mongols used gold, silver, and etc., resources gained from trade, to decorate the palace. Also, not only was the court beautiful and pleasing to the eye, it was so well organized and well ordered according to Odoric of Pordenone, a Catholic missionary. Everybody who worked in the court had a task to do and complete and didn’t interfere with the others negatively. In addition to the court, many also looked at the Mongols’ unity and deemed it as a “perfect” society. Within the Mongol territory, the Mongols had affection and honor towards one another. Murder and conflict was a rarity in the empire and everybody was regarded as family. In addition, even paintings and art that depicted the rulers of the Mongol Empire showed the Mongols in a positive light. For example, the paintings of Kublai Khan and his wife shows the “civilized” and calm version of the empire. The artists could have depicted the rulers as murders, but choose to the
Show More

Related Documents: Mongols Dbq Analysis

Mongols Barbaric Dbq Analysis

There is a lot of controversy on whether or not the Mongols were civilized, or whether they were of a barbaric kind. Several indisputable cases that the Mongols were Barbarians have been brought to light, but then again, there are also various facts that contradict these indisputable cases. In the Mongols DBQ Packet the majority of the documents sways towards the Mongols being civilized and not barbaric. They show the complexity required to be called a civilization even though they may not have lasted…

Words 685 - Pages 3

Mongol Empire Dbq Analysis

The Mongol Empire was the gigantic terrain empire in history. The empire area of land lengthy from the Yellow Sea in eastern Asia to the borders of eastern Europe. Portions of countries including Russia, Thailand, Vietnam and Burma were all part of the Mongol Empire. In addition, the Mongols were also known as Tatars because they were the most savage conquerors in history. This extensive empire helped develop connection between other nations. Despite that the empire was vicious, the Mongol Empire…

Words 824 - Pages 4

Mongol Empire Dbq Analysis

however, managed to overtake more land than the three aforementioned combined in just 65 years: Genghis Khan. Leading the Mongol empire from 1162 to 1227, he brought almost five million square miles of land under Mongol control, which is greater than the areas of the modern United States of America and Mexico combined (DBQ Project). Now, many people in the 21st century think of the Mongols as being barbaric warriors, massacring entire cities in cold blood (John Green). This begs the question, could…

Words 206 - Pages 1