North And South Civil War Analysis

Words: 865
Pages: 4

Compare the war strategies of Northern and Southern Civil War leaders. Which were most effective, and why?

The Civil War was a conflict between the North and the South resulting from unresolved differences. Among which were the issues of State’s rights and of slavery. In some senses, the Civil War was one of many conflicts between the North and the South starting at the first half of the 19th century, arguably starting with the Missouri compromise of 1820. Along the way, the Wilmot Proviso, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas Nebraska act of 1854, Lincoln’s election, the Dred Scott case, rebellions and raids by both pro-slavery and abolitionists, along with abolitionist literature all contributed an increasing division between the North and South, ultimately leading to the Civil War.

The goal for both the Union and the Confederates was simple: to break the other’s will to fight. For the Confederacy, the Civil war
…show more content…
Its population was doubled that of the South and had more than double the capital. In addition, the North had a large advantage in manufacturing capabilities, with three times the factories and six times the workers. In total, the Union produced more goods, more food, more coal and steel, had more railroads, and had a much more powerful navy. The Union’s goals were simple: to invade and crush the rebellion, to keep the border states loyal to the Union, to isolate the Confederacy, and to prevent intervention by European nations in favor of the Confederacy. For the Confederacy, their goals were to defend the Southern states from Union invasions, to preserve the Confederate army, to break the Union’s will to fight, and to obtain aid from foreign powers. The Confederacy had the advantages of fighting on their own soil, as well as having higher morale and more trained and experienced officers in the Confederate Army, which, at the beginning of the war, was not much smaller in force than the Union