Should We Replace The Electoral College?

Words: 454
Pages: 2

Congress considered several methods for electing a president. A committee, called the Committee of Eleven proposed a method for electing a president and that is by an indirect election through a College of Electors. The original purpose of the Electoral College is to be a compromise between the election of the president by the vote of Congress and the popular vote of the people. The founding fathers established the electoral college in the US Constitution, believing that it would be both a buffer and provide fair power to all states regardless of size. In other words, They considered the average American uniformed and unable to select the right person for President so they wanted a group of informed people selecting the PresidentAlso, James Madison, one of the founders, believed that if a majority vote was to be used, the rights of minortities could be compromised. The Electoral College serve the purpose effectively because the orginial intent was to make candidates pay attention to the smaller and less populated states.

Direct democracy is a type of democracy where the power is placed
…show more content…
There’s large possibility that presidential candidates would mainly focus on larger states and not be attentive to smaller states. Larger states would control the outcome of the results. A direct election system can also give rise to multiple political parties and splinter the vote.

Should the Electoral College be replaced? In my opinion, I think the Electoral College should be replaced. Everybody should have the freedom to chooose whomever they want to be elected as president, not just a handful of people. There are disadvantages, but if everyone were to be properly educated on the candidates people can rule out who and not to vote for. Each vote would make a difference and this could lead to increased voting across the country. One person, one