Stephen King The Stand Analysis

Words: 471
Pages: 2

In The Stand by Stephen King, the social commentary warns of expanding technology and human nature. We make new diseases everyday. These hybrid diseases break loose and spread like wildfire. The government, for example, created biochemical warfare like mustard gas, and they’ve also use small pox as a weapon to kill off the tribes on the Trail of Tears. Of course there is also the conspiracy theorists that believe they have created diseases like AIDS and Lyme Disease. Some think it’s okay as long as they are trying to help, or they think it’s what’s best. Only, when they make a disease that kills most of the population like a plague, there’s worldwide panic. When this plague happens, people automatically start destroying things, or the start trying to regroup and make what they’re given, a better …show more content…
A great example of this, is when the mysterious character, Randall Flagg, starts to talk about human nature. He says, “Show me a man or a woman alone and I'll show you a saint. Give me two and they'll fall in love. Give me three and they'll invent the charming thing we call 'society'. Give me four and they'll build a pyramid. Give me five and they'll make one an outcast. Give me six and they'll reinvent prejudice. Give me seven and in seven years they'll reinvent warfare. Man may have been made in the image of God, but human society was made in the image of His opposite number, and is always trying to get back home” (King 754). Though there is almost no one left on Earth (no one sane at least) there is still the people who were born to wreck and the people who were born to do good. It all depends on which side is stronger. Though there is no plague happening in the world right now, there are still overpowering people such as dictators and religious figures ruling over us. We just need to decide which one gets more of