Why The Death Penalty Is Wrong

Words: 960
Pages: 4

The inconsistencies found within the sentencing of the death penalty is another prime example as to how the death penalty is unreliable and unfair. "Two people can commit the same offense but receive very different treatment, depending on where they live” ("The Death”). The famous Mahatma Gandhi once said “You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty”. With this being said there is never reason to take a life for a life in the hopes that it will keep others from creating a mistake previously made by another. Because the combined humanity of all of the people alike can overcome the hapless decisions of another.
Furthermore, the death penalty is highly hypocritical.
…show more content…
If this were the case it would not be seen as amends for crimes that are not justifiable, among which include murder. Therefore the death penalty is at fault because it deals with murderers by stooping as low as them and committing the very crime it looks down upon. Murder for murder is not something that should be tolerated by us as humans or as a country. People should not be supportive of taking life for a life because in turn the very act which is despised and deemed inhumane is being accepted and enacted again and again. "...it brutalizes society and denies the value of life” (“The Death Penalty”). If life was truly valued as much as it is taken by citizens and the government the death penalty would not still be used in over half of America. The death penalty belittles a person for their mistakes and then takes their life. This is wrong, and it keeps people in fear. The death penalty takes advantage of people’s belief. …show more content…
A better way to deal with these criminals would be to make them into well mannered, and redeemable ladies and gentlemen. Setting up work programs in the prisons “Prisoners should work in jobs which are not slave-like and allow for some dignity and purpose in life for the inmate” (“Life Imprisonment”). This could be good for the inmates and keeping them out of trouble, and from harming themselves, fellow inmates and even the guards. Implementing a program such as this would show that the government does believe in the importance of valuing all human lives. The funds from them working could also be given to the families as reparation for what they have had to endure. Another simple way to deal with the inmates is to just keep them imprisoned with no chance at parole. This is a reasonable option because it is common for most people to think that it is not fair for criminals to live their lives free after they have taken another. They feel as though the inmate should have to live with the consequences and quilt of what it is that they have done for the rest of their lives and while it is not the most optimistic option it is reasonable and no more lives need to be taken. Even life without parole combined with the reparation programs would