A Life Beyond Do What You Love Analysis

Words: 923
Pages: 4

Right now, how many of you can relate to living paycheck to paycheck or even having to be broke because other needs and family come first? In “A Life Beyond ‘Do What You Love’”, Marino effectively argue(s) that for humanity’s sake sometimes we should do things we do not enjoy by persuading the readers with appealing to their emotions, establishing credibility through his work as a counselor, focusing on the argument and the counter arguments as well. Marino discusses the idea ‘Should we or should we not do what we love?’, but talks about is it right for us to be selfish or should we do what is best for humanity. The humanity being friends, family, the community, even the world.
Marino uses his father’s experience to appeal to the audience. He appeals to the emotions because he talks about people doing what they love to take care the people they care about. Marino talks about his father not doing what he loved. Thus, so he could send his kids to college. People who were not educated well still live paycheck to paycheck to keep food on the table for their family. People usually had to push aside their wants, passions, and talents for the beneficial effects on
…show more content…
Dr. Marino effectively proves that by using his counter arguments, or procataleptic. Marino explains the points of Miya Tokumitsu, Kant, and Dr. King. This established credibility but also helped the arguments. Adding both sides of the argument tells us that he is letting us choose what we believe is right in this scenario. In many cases, people can be on one side or another with hard to change opinions. “Miya Tokumitsu argued that the “Do What You Love”… degrades work that is not done from love.” (Page 1, Para 3). “Thinkers as profound as Kant” (Page 2, Para 5). “Dr. King taught that every life is marked… Length refers to self-love, breadth to the community and care of others, and height to the