Antony And Brutus In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Words: 538
Pages: 3

Numerous things could go wrong within a friendship that would cause sticking by one’s best friend's side a difficult thing to do. That was the case in Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare, which takes place in ancient Rome. In this play, the people choose Caesar to be the new Roman king. However, the conspirators do not agree with this choice because they feel that Caesar is no better than the other men of Rome. They think that Caesar will let all the power go to his head. His friend, Marcus Brutus feels strongly about this and ends up stabbing Caesar. Fairly upset by this news, Mark Antony feels angry with Brutus. Although Brutus knows it is a risky idea, he lets Antony talk at Caesar’s funeral where they both give speeches attempting to use logic, ethic and appeal to the people’s emotions. Before Brutus talks, the people are angry with him, before long, they want him to be king. Antony’s speech turned everyone to wanting to kill Brutus. Although Brutus had a better emotional statement, …show more content…
To undoubtedly appeal to the audience, the speaker should attempt to use logic to make it easier for whoever is listening to understand. Antony used logic in his speech when he talks about the events that genuinely did happen,”I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?” (3.2.24-25). Talking about things the people witnessed and know are true, proves he has a good logical speech. Brutus, on the other hand, tried to use logic as well, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (3.2.11-12). Brutus’ approach of logic was more of an opinion than a factual statement. Since the people do not know if Brutus is lying or being truthful, he does not have a very strong logical speech. Having logic in a speech could make any audience more interested, but since Antony’s speech had a greater use of it, his is better than