Argument Against The Electoral College

Words: 602
Pages: 3

POSC 101 Essay The Electoral College consists of a group of electors who are chosen by the voters in each and every state to elect the vice president and the president. Since the start of the United States, the college has been utilized to select the President. All of us have an equivalent voice in electing the people that work in the government. When citizens vote for president and vice president, they are not voting directly for the candidates. Therefore, the citizens are voting for electors that will cast their ballots in Electoral College. (Henschen 189)
What’s so great about this particular college is that it guards the interests of minority. It maintained the voice of states with more rural areas and lower populations. Despite the fact that the urban areas are considered to be more inhabited, the college retrains the interests of
…show more content…
In United States, the enormous protestation against the college is that it doesn’t reflect the popular vote. (Editor 1) The majority of the citizens have the opportunity to vote for a president, and under the right circumstances, the adversary will eventually become president instead. This means that without reflecting the popular vote, then it will become raise concern for some citizens. Furthermore, the victor of the popular vote may not triumph the presidency. For instance, Al Gore won the popular vote, but lost the Electoral College in the 2000 US election. Bush had 271 electoral votes and 47.9% whereas Gore had 266 electoral votes and 48.4%. Bush was declared the winner of the election and became the president of the United States. However, Bush did not win the popular vote since Al Gore was the one who obtained that. (keyframe5 1) This may confuse the citizens because they would think that the popular vote would determine who would be the president, but that’s not always the case. Electoral votes are more significant than popular