Colonial Leaders Essay

Words: 636
Pages: 3

The relationship between the European Leaders and the Colonial Citizens during the Colonial period was tense and mistrustful, just the beginning of this was the Proclamation of 1763. At the end of the French and Indian war, King George III issued a new order that prohibited settlements west of a certain line going through the Appalachians, from New England to the Carolinas. The suppression of the Colonist’s urge to expand their territory, as they wanted to grow in population and needed more space, disrupted the relations between the colonists and European Leaders further. On top of that, the British commander in chief, Jeffrey Amherst, did damage to the relations between the Colonists and the Indians by asserting his dominance and ending …show more content…
Among these acts were prohibition of loading and unloading of ships in the Boston port until the Boston tea party was paid off, a revision of the Massachusetts government, a law that made trials for Crown officers in Britain, and a new quartering act that extended to every colony. A common name for these four acts, was the “intolerable acts”. Not only were these acts not appreciated by the colonial Americans, but they continued and called them intolerable, they may have been tolerable from a trustworthy and fair crown, but the Colonists didn’t view the European leaders as such. Insofar as furthering America, little could be done to move forward when sustaining their current situation became that much more difficult. Specifically the Boston Port Act was detrimental to America, as the other colonies needed to work harder simply to keep Boston alive when it wasn’t being provided for by ships. The ridiculous laws put in place by the European leaders showed the colonists that they were willing to put the mainland above the colonies, a sacrifice the colonists weren’t inclined to accept, and their apprehension grew with every new act