Federalist 10 Analysis

Words: 1312
Pages: 6
Open Document
The Federalist Papers serve as a detailed account which textually preserves the motivations that led to the founding of the United States; And through my reading of the papers, I have determined these intentions to be wholly moral and virtuous in nature. My commentary will focus upon the 10th, 39th, and 51st Federalist papers which concern Factions, American Republicanism, and Checks & Balances respectively. Federalist 10 explores the concept of controlling factions through governmental structure, as Madison fervently believed factions could not be eliminated without extinguishing individual liberty. I agree wholeheartedly with Madison and hold his opinion as a commonly accepted fact. Federalist 39 is perhaps the most important paper Madison, …show more content…
Rather than being wholly essential to the structure of the United States’ government as the other articles i’m reviewing in this paper are, Federalist 10 gives great insight into the minds of the Federalist authors through Madison’s commentary on factions. I regard this commentary to be well written, conceptually brilliant, and beneficial to the understanding of how the Founders’ and specifically Madison's individual political theories may have contributed to the Constitution. Federalist 10 develops Madison’s answer to the problem of faction violence, something which Madison considers a “dangerous vice” (Madison) in republican …show more content…
Liberty is to faction what air is to fire, an aliment without which it instantly expires.” (Madison)
The intent in the founding of the Unites States was to protect “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” (Declaration of Independence), therefore such a method ideologically wouldn’t be correct. As I read it, the second method appeared familiar. Though it wouldn’t occur for another 146 years, this method seems to align exactly with the practices of Nazi Germany. By controlling the opinions, passions, and interests of their citizens, the Nazis successfully crushed other opposing factions at the cost of individuality. Though factions are theorized to be unavoidable by Madison as conflicting ideas, interests, and passions, are woven into the fabric of all societies by nature of man, he believes that violence from these factions can be broken apart and controlled by a well-constructed union. Madison then defines what he believes to be a well constructed union as a representative form of government in which the governing document checks the power of factions. This paper shows the Federalist’s true intent of creating a republican form of government, and gives the reader a glimpse into the negative alternatives such as no individual liberties or violent factions. The 39th Federalist Paper ties in directly with the 10th in proposing the creation of a republican government. In 10, Madison
Show More

Related Documents: Federalist 10 Analysis

Federalist No. 10 Analysis

The Federalist Papers were written to describe key features within the U.S. Constitution and to promote the ratification of the document. A three-man committee of Founding Fathers wrote the essays and selections of the Papers. These men were James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. Madison is the one who wrote No. 10, and he described the functionality and the aspects of factions. His views on factions greatly influenced the Constitution and still applies to contemporary government. To begin…

Words 739 - Pages 3

Madison's Federalist 10 Analysis

Madison’s Federalist #10 deals with the issue of which type of government best settles the problems caused by factions. Factions are groups of people who unite for a common cause. Madison stated that a Republican form of government, by which the people elect representatives, is better than the form of representation in a pure democracy. A pure democracy will only increase the troubles presented by fractions. Fractions are usually formed by self interest. People of different social status, economic…

Words 483 - Pages 2

What Is Hamilton's Role During The French Revolution

He supported the constitution and believed in a loose interpretation of it, along with believing America should have a strong central government. He and the rest of the federalist party wanted to strengthen the national credit by creating a bank and pushed for funding at par and assumption.Although Hamilton was pro-britain, he also would have been known as pro-patriot. Like many other patriots, he joined the Sons of Liberty…

Words 945 - Pages 4

Legalization Marijuana Essay

1. Differences in political philosophy I. Federalists: (Democrats) Believed in the need for a strong central government. Believed that the central government would protect the citizens in a way that the states couldn’t or wouldn’t. Thought that this was the only way to create a country rather than just 13 states. II. Anti-Federalists: (Republicans) Thought most power must remain with the States. Feared tyranny like the British Monarchy would result from a strong central government. Said if they…

Words 3988 - Pages 16

United States and Essential Questions Essay

frame class discussions; these are often used as writing assignments. Assessment of essays are measured by the following: the degree to which they fully and directly answer the question, the strength of thesis statement, level and effectiveness of analysis, amount and quality of supporting evidence, and organizational quality. In addition to these standards, DBQs are graded on the basis of the degree to which a significant number of the documents have been used to support the thesis, and the amount…

Words 7288 - Pages 30

Rhetorical Analysis: The Monuments Must Go

great-great-grandfather, Stonewall Jackson, located in Richmond, Virginia should be removed because it has been co- opted by white supremacist groups. On the other side of the argument John Daniel Davidson, who is the editor-in-chief of the online publication The Federalist, argues that historical Confed- erate statues should stay right where they are located. In more depth Davidson ultimately be- lieves that even though: “they were wrong about slavery does not excuse us today from the bur- den of trying to understand…

Words 1515 - Pages 7

Study Guide for US History Essay

AP American History Free Response Essays Each day will have a specific essay question. For the 1st Quarter ONLY, you are to simply write a detailed outline of what you would include in your essay. From the 2nd Quarter on, you are to write both a detailed outline and the essay with it. The date listed will be the day the assignment is due. September 16, 2009 Compare the cultures that could be found in the New World prior to the Europeans. Why were some groups more advanced than others throughout…

Words 3601 - Pages 15

1 Amendment To The Constitution Always With You Essay

the United States was held by founding fathers. On December 15th of the same year, they adapted and ratified the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution of the US. The Bill of Rights was written by a statesmen and political theorist, also known as “Father of Constitution”, James Madison. Owing to him and to Anti-Federalists, who criticized the Constitution of the US due to absence of the human rights, the Bill of Rights was drafted. So it was written to protect the individual…

Words 2262 - Pages 10

Managing Up Unit 1 Psmp Assignment Wanna Case Study Review Essay

Reading Wanna, J 2007, ‘Improving federalism: drivers of change, repair options and reform scenarios’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 275 – 279. Purpose (What is the author’s aim? For example, is the piece descriptive or does it summarise the literature or introduce a new argument? Is the author trying to convince, persuade, or inform the reader? Use a verb.) (59) The author aims to inform the reader of the strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for reform of…

Words 2272 - Pages 10

History Of Convicts

ECON 1141 Tutorials Tutorial 1 Yagan Social History: Race relations Activity between the aboriginals and settlers Seen as an outlaw but also noble Patriotism (the British understand it) Economic History: Scarcity of resources (food) Father was executed Property rights (livestock being taken, land for aboriginals) Wasn’t best outcome for both parties (pareto optimality) Kable Social History: First fleet to NSW Governor Arthur Philip appointed him as an overseer Brought a sense of trust…

Words 2596 - Pages 11