Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

Words: 833
Pages: 4
Open Document
While the Constitution was being sent to get approval from state legislatures, delegates split into two distinct groups, the Federalists, and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist style of government provides a suitable argument to claim a place as the superior point of view. Federalists supported the Constitution and argued for immediate ratification. Perhaps the most famous Federalist is James Madison. He was a Federalist who went on to become the fourth president of the United States of America. Federalists wanted a strong central government, three branches of government, and no Bill of Rights. Federalists and Anti-Federalist had very different points of views. Federalists wanted a strong central government that would have control over …show more content…
Alexander Hamilton thought that adding in the Bill of Rights to the Constitution could be dangerous. He says that listing people’s rights could give the government cause to restrict rights and power from the …show more content…
Anti-Federalists wanted the states to rule supreme. Anti-Federalists felt like it was important for the people to have the power. Anti-Federalists wanted a decentralized government, meaning that the top-decision don’t come from one source, but throughout the government. Anti-Federalists wanted there to be a “one,states, one vote” system. This gives the states power since the national government depends on the states. Famous Anti-Federalists are Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee. Anti-Federalists did not want a strong central government, “And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government.“, evident by this quote. Anti-Federalists wanted to have a Bill of Rights to protect individual rights. The Bill of Rights would protect the rights of the people since they are all written down clearly. Anti-Federalists did not want a militia, “It might be here shewn, that the power in the federal legislative, to raise and support armies at pleasure, as well in peace as in war, and their control over the militia, tend, not only to a consolidation of the government, but the destruction of liberty.“, evident in this quote. They thought it would bring “the destruction of
Show More

Related Documents: Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

called Anti-Federalists and their views would not be as successful as the minds of the Federalists, since Anti-Federalist idea’s had many of the same characteristics as the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution needed to be ratified in order to bring change and solve the problems the Articles of Confederation left behind. One of the most known differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist groups was the idea of government and who should be running the nation. Federalists believe…

Words 887 - Pages 4

Federalists Vs Anti-Federalist Parties

The newly formed government of United States of America was split between two parties, federalist and anti-federalist parties. Both parties disagreed on the topic of should states have more power, or should there be a national government which presides over states rights. This eventually led to the formation of the Bill of Rights adding over the Constitution. The federalist and anti-federalist parties showed disagreements over the Bill of Rights, which gives framework through the nation. The Bill…

Words 594 - Pages 3

Compare And Contrast The Anti-Democrats Vs Anti Federalists

The Anti-Federalists attacked the Constitution's separation of powers from the perspective that there was a homogenization of the various branches of government. In Centinel I, it argues that there was not enough separation powers among the branches . The Anti-Federalists believed that the necessary separation of powers were dependent on a caste system not established in the United States, such as an aristocracy as opposed to a bourgeoisie. Federalists argued for the supplying of the positions…

Words 572 - Pages 3

Antifederalists Vs Federalists Essay

from pro-independence vs anti-independence to Federalists vs Antifederalists, and as such the American people were left at an impasse and had to eventually reach a good compromise for the United States of America to progress, and of which was all documented on Magruder’s American Government. To give a brief overview of who the Federalists and Antifederalists were; the Federalists and Antifederalists were two groups on opposing sides of the constitution(56). The Federalists supported the Constitution…

Words 568 - Pages 3

Constitution Amendment Essay

contained the states. In different phrases, the proposed Constitution might make the joined States a domain of one individuals as opposed to a detached confederation of states. The main supporters of the Constitution of the United States were the Federalists. Some of these supporters were James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, who were to blame…

Words 1222 - Pages 5

Chicago Style Essay

Joshua Gonzalez 10/31/13 During the American Revolution, the continental congress framed our first constitution. This was called “The Articles of Confederation”. After the American Revolution it was quickly determined that these Articles were weak and reserved too much power to the individual states. So in 1787, fifty-five delegates came together in Philadelphia to draft a new…

Words 348 - Pages 2

Essay history unit 3 notecard

Unit 3 history test Washington: Wanted nation on its feet and constitution moving forward. Federalist. Secretary of state: Jefferson, treasury: Hamilton, war: Knox. Neutrality proclamation of 1778: avoiding war in French and British war (federalists pro-Britain= angered them). Farewell address: no formation of political parties (sectionalism is dangerous), no permanent foreign alliances (remain friendly, but being too close clouds governments judgment in conflicts), importance of morals and religion…

Words 872 - Pages 4

Essay Anything: Slavery in the United States and Slavery

social, political and economic causes a. Would there have been a split without slavery – no – root of all conflicts b. Conflicts existed from birth of nation II. Economic – two competing industries – industrial north vs. agrarian south – free labor vs. slave labor a. Tariff battle for almost a century – south wants low, north high i. Believed in nullification of Congressional laws 1. Goes back to Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions regarding Alien…

Words 419 - Pages 2

Why Did The Framers Fear Political Parties?

agreeance of the platform into factions(as they were called in federalist 10 by James Madison) and these become parties. People will inevitably agree with one side more than the other. They then will work to run the nation in their vision, trying to outshine the other. In America, these factions have recurred numerous times: Federalist vs Anti-Federalists, Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians, Democrat-republicans vs Federalists, Democrats vs Republicans, and the Election of 1800 in which John Adams and…

Words 779 - Pages 4

SECTION 4 MID 2 Essay

for the Americans? a. Political instability in Mexico shortly after its independent from Spain. b. Sparse settlement of the Mexicans VS. willing settlements of Americans due to pop growth. c. People on the frontier of Mexico have no loyalty to the Mexican government. **************************************************************************** 8. How did the Federalists believe that the 1.2 billion acres of land should be distributed? Why? Federalism (Alexander Hamilton): Pro - big government, pro-…

Words 923 - Pages 4