Hobbes Government

Words: 419

Pages: 2

Open Document

Hobbes' theory of government is set out in Leviathan (1651). Hobbes challenged the two predominant views of governmental authority. One held that the authority of kings derived from God (Divine Right) and that a king's power should be absolute, as it came from God. The other held that government existed for the benefit of the people and derived authority from that. Hobbes began his argument with his pessimistic theory of human nature. He thought that people were by nature greedy and selfish, and would look out only for themselves. He argued that before there was organized society, people lived in the state of nature, a "war of all against all", in which life was "solitary, poor, brutish, nasty, and short". Everyone could do as they pleased, they had absolute liberty, but could not enjoy this liberty because the war …show more content…
Chaos and disorder would rule. Hobbes argued that, eventually, human reason prevailed and that people organized themselves into societies to overcome the perils of the state of nature. They agreed to give up their individual liberty to the state, which would protect them from each other. This was the social contract, wherein individuals gave to the state their liberty in exchange for protection from themselves. Anyone who enjoyed the benefits of the social contract is a party to it, whether or not they agree explicitly or tacitly. It was not something you could have opted out of. It was binding and permanent, it came before you and would continue after you. To Hobbes, the greatest evil is a return to the perilous state of nature in which the rights of all people to enjoy their lives is in danger. This means that people must obey their government, no matter how unjustly it behaves, because it is the only thing that protects them from themselves and returning to the state of

Hobbes Ideal Government

different views on government. The first philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, thought that people were naturally born evil and that people need a government to provide stability and peace. The leader in his ideal government should have all power so that that people do not become uncontrollable. The second philosopher, John Locke, thought that people were born with a clean slate and he also thought that the government provides stability and peace. His ideal government was the government giving the people rights…

Words 516 - Pages 3

Who Is Thomas Hobbes Ideal Government During The Enlightenment

During the Enlightenment, key philosophers contributed different opinions about government and society. Thomas Hobbes wrote a book called Leviathan, in which he expressed his ideas. Following his experiences with the English Civil War, Hobbes came to the conclusion that all humans were naturally selfish and wicked. He believed that it was necessary for people to hand over their rights to a strong leader in exchange for law and order, in an agreement he called a social contract. Since he believed…

Words 997 - Pages 4

Hobbes And Locke Compare And Contrast

political science, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke held similar views during the enlightened era, although when analyzed more thoroughly, the difference between both philosophers is prominent. Though Hobbes and Locke both agreed that government was necessary to maintain a sustainable society, they disagreed on the role that government should play. Hobbes believed that a strong government is needed to protect individuals from their selfish nature. Locke believed that government should serve the people…

Words 1048 - Pages 5

Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

History Locke Vs Hobbes During the 18th centuries, the movement that are known as the “Enlightenment” brought many more idea into play in European society. Two of these contributors are Locke and Hobbes. While they are both natural law theorist and social contract theorist, their similarities ends there. Hobbes supports order and monarch, while Locke liberties and republic. On the matters on governments, Locke and Hobbes have opposite thought…

Words 667 - Pages 3

How Did John Locke's Influence On Government

The object of this essay is to compare and contrast Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s ideas in the state of nature and how it has an influence on government. Both Hobbes and Locke write similar when referring to the state of nature, they raise the idea that man can exist without government, but that it comes with risks. Hobbes speaks of the nature itself, while Locke makes examples to prove it. The Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government help explain Hobbes’s and Locke’s ideas and the points they…

Words 1513 - Pages 7

Why Is There Peace In George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four?

spending. This view then leads to the questions of whether a government is needed to have peace. Since the government appears to be in a state of continual conflict, would the world order be better without such intervention? Can peace be reached through…

Words 1157 - Pages 5

Essay on Help on Homewrok

The Materialist View of Human Nature Hobbes believed that all phenomena in the universe, without exception, can be explained in terms of the motions and interactions of material bodies. He did not believe in the soul, or in the mind as separate from the body, or in any of the other incorporeal and metaphysical entities in which other writers have believed. Instead, he saw human beings as essentially machines, with even their thoughts and emotions operating according to physical laws and chains of…

Words 1197 - Pages 5

How Did Thomas Hobbes Influence Society

war going on. Thomas Hobbes was an english philosopher , scientist and historian that tried to end the bloody war. Thomas Hobbes also created a famous work called Leviathan. That focused on political philosophy. He believed that the form of government was the absolute monarchy. His great influence on political thought was deep and lasting, therefore Thomas Hobbes had a positive effect on the political effects of England by giving up personal freedom to form states. Thomas Hobbes believed that people…

Words 644 - Pages 3

Thomas Vs Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes’s dilemma of the state of nature is that of a society of no government, no police, no courts, no laws, and no central authority. if humans were left to themselves without government, Hobbes claims, then life would be horrible, nasty and brutish. Hobbes implies that human beings are essentially selfish and without government human beings would hurt and kill each other without hesitation. According to Hobbes, people agree to be moral and not to hurt others only if they negotiate with…

Words 791 - Pages 4

Governmental Philsophies: Locke vs. Hobbes Essay

A. Thomas Hobbes 1. Hobbes believed that people were naturally selfish, unsociable human beings. Human beings in general were simple minded, with selfish desires, and were most influenced by their desire for power over others. Hobbes believed that man were addicted to having power, and quarrel amongst people is only natural. Men also live by a “social contract” in which they treat others the way they wish to be treated themselves. Yet this social contract is not substantial enough to maintain order…

Words 819 - Pages 4