How Is Andrew Jackson's Presidency Unconstitutional

Words: 513
Pages: 3

Andrew Jackson’s Presidency
Would you want a president who would fight in duels? Well that is what happened with our seventh president, Andrew Jackson. Andrew Jackson was an awful president, for many reasons. He had a kitchen cabinet and pet cabinets. Next, he introduced the tariff of 1828. Finally, Jackson’s Indian policy was a terrible idea.
Jackson had kitchen and pet cabinets whom he would go to for advice on any of his decisions, instead of the elected cabinet. His kitchen and pet cabinets were of people he trusted for advice and people who were his friends and agreed with him. The problem with this is that he is not going to the most well educated people (the cabinet) for advice, but instead going to his friends. This could lead Jackson to make a wrong decision, not knowing what the other side has to
…show more content…
Next, Andrew Jackson proposed and passed the tariff of 1828 forcing the states to pay higher taxes on imported goods. These higher prices mean higher prices for imported factory goods. This mean the south would have to pay higher taxes. The north favored the tariff because the tariff would allow American manufacturers to outsell competitors. Higher tariffs also meant that trade among nations would be discouraged. This meant that the cotton sales from the south could be disrupted and could leave many people with less money. This law, favoring one region (the north) was unconstitutional. Finally, Jackson’s Indian policy was another horrible idea. The policy forcefully moved the Indians across the Mississippi so the whites could get more land. An Excerpt from Andrew Jackson’s Nullification Proclamation (1832) states that “For the dream of a separate independence-a dream interrupted by bloody conflicts with your