John Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

Words: 497
Pages: 2

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, they both had completely different views of the ideal state. Each of them supported their own ideas and also considered it correct. And they had their own vision about the ideal state. But what is the state for us, for people, each of us wants to live under sustained, strong state that could protect people from a variety of disasters and accidents. I believe that each of us wants to live in peace, without various kinds of violence and coercion to anything. But not everyone can put forward their own rights and they can only obey, as it sounds awful, but it's a fact of life. Thomas Hobbes believed that “every person seeks to maximize meet their needs. In the absence of …show more content…
Such people are called subjects, and those who lead these people, or rather who supervises the supreme power is called sovereign. According to Thomas Hobbes he thought that to achieve supreme power, there are two ways, One - a physical force, such as when someone makes to obey their authority, second - this is a voluntary agreement of people to obey the man or the group of people, in the hope that this person or this meeting will be able to protect them against all the others. In the first case, people are forced against their will to obey the head of state. I believe that it is wrong; it can even be assigned to one of the types of violence. In the second case it has been going on a voluntary free will, when no one is forced to do anything, because people live in the belief that such kind of state would protect them from any disasters. “This state can be called a political state, or the state, based on the establishment, and the state, founded the first way - the state, based on the acquisition.”(Chapter