Loving V. Virginia Case Study

Words: 371
Pages: 2
Open Document
Loving v. Virginia was a case brought to the Supreme Court in 1967. It’s orgins started with Richard and Mildred Loving, an interracial couple. To exchange wedding vows, the Lovings traveled to Washington DC, where their marriage was legal, and then returned home to Virginia. At the time, Virginia deemed interracial marriage illegal. After a short five weeks, the couple was arrested and charged with a felony for violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law. In court, the couple pleaded guilty, and were originally sentenced to one year in prison. However, the judge suspended their sentence with one condition: the Lovings were exiled from Virginia, and couldn’t return for 25 years. Mildred and Richard relocated to Washington DC, where they raised
Show More

Related Documents: Loving V. Virginia Case Study

Loving Vs Virginia

For my reaction paper, I will be covering the Supreme Court Case Loving v. Virginia. The Appellant of the case is Richard Loving and the Appellee is the State of Virginia. Richard Loving is a a white man who married Mildred Jeter, a black woman in DC. They resided in Virginia but traveled to DC to get married legally. After acquiring the marriage certificate, they moved back to Virginia. However, the state of Virginia enacted laws that labeled interracial marriages as a felony. It was their antimiscegenation…

Words 1136 - Pages 5

Pros And Cons Of Interracial Families

Purpose: The purpose of writing this research report is to better understand the trials and tribulations interracial couples and families face. 1. Love knows no boundaries 2. Pros & Cons 3. Experiences Findings: 1. Love knows no boundaries There are no boundaries when it comes to love; not race, religion, culture, gender, etc. The only reason these “boundaries” have ever existed is because society has helped create them. Allowing society to create these labels that segregate everyone is the reason…

Words 2489 - Pages 10

Essay about Gay Marriage

not a heterosexual privilege. Same­sex marriage is a civil right. The 1967 Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia confirmed that marriage is "one of the basic civil rights of man," and same­sex marriages should receive the same protections given to interracial marriages by that ruling. Legalizing gay marriage will not harm heterosexual marriages or "family values," and society will continue to function successfully [1]. Then, a study published on Apr. 13, 2009 in Social Science Quarterly found that "laws permitting…

Words 1182 - Pages 5

Government: First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Navigation Privileges Precedent Essay

Alexys Allen August 1, 2014 Part Three: Court Cases 1. Marbury v. Madison(1803): Designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia the last minute appointment were never fully finalized Precedent: when the constitution conflicts with an act of the legislature that act is invalidated established the supreme courts power of judicial law 2. McCulloch v. Maryland(1819): The state of Maryland passed legislation to impose lanes on the bank, McCulloch the cashier, of Baltimore…

Words 3075 - Pages 13

African American and Civil Rights Essay

movement is big part of their history. African American was brought over to America in 1619 in Virginia as slaves to work on farms as well as do other things. Most were sold into slavery as prisoners of war by African states of kidnaped by African, Arab, European, or American slave traders. However slavery already existed in Africa before Europe arrived. The slaves that arrived in Virginia were treated as indentured servants by English settlers and they were released after a number of years…

Words 2575 - Pages 11

Compare and Contrast Essay

protection in the event of the relationship ending. Legalizing gay marriage will not harm heterosexual marriages or “family values”. A study published on April 13, 2009 in Social Science Quarterly found that “laws permitting same sex marriage or civil unions have no adverse affects on marriage, divorce, and abortion rates.” The 1967 Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia confirmed that marriage is "one of the basic civil rights of man," and same-sex marriages should receive the same protections by that…

Words 789 - Pages 4

Homosexuality and Children Essay examples

to deny either sex the right to express their love by sharing it with the growth of a child. Whether it be together as a unit or alone as an individual, no man or woman should be rejected when requesting a chance to provide a helpless soul with a loving and nurturing environment. Society has sculpted homosexuality to be disapproved. In all reality, who is to say what is normal? Why should gay and lesbian individuals be rejected when all they want to do is share their love and care for a vulnerable…

Words 2274 - Pages 10

White Supremacy In America

implemented during the Jim Crow era in order to govern the lives of African Americans. For example, it was illegal for a white person to marry a non-white person, but in 1967 based on the decision that was made in the landmark civil rights case Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), that law was confuted (Wallenstein…

Words 1665 - Pages 7

Questioning The Constitutionality Of Bans On Marriage

court cases have questioned the constitutionality of laws put in place to prevent a certain kind of person from doing something. In Loving v. Virginia, Mildred Jeter, an African/Native American mix, and Richard Loving, a white man, challenged the state of Virginia's law that banned interracial marriage between whites and blacks. At the end of the trial, the Supreme Court ruled that, by refusing to recognise the union of marriage between a black woman and a white male, or vice versa, Virginia was going…

Words 3079 - Pages 13

Essay about Gay Marriage

prostitution, heterosexual monogamy can be considered "unnatural” in evolutionary terms. [3] 3.Gay marriage is protected by the Constitution's commitments to liberty and equality. The US Supreme Court declared in 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause.” US District Judge Vaughn Walker wrote on Aug. 4, 2010 that Prop. 8 in California banning gay marriage was…

Words 2049 - Pages 9