The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

Words: 816
Pages: 4

The popular vote of the United States should determine who should be elected into office. The Electoral College ruins the chances of a president being elected due to the amount of Electoral votes. This puts smaller states at a disadvantage due to the lack of campaigning in a certain state. The only states who even receive a slight bit of consideration when presidents run are the ones with the most votes. Such as Texas, California, Florida and New York. These states are key factors which have a huge effect on what candidate will win the Presidential Election. With this we can say that the Election Process is not fair. Or in better words the Electoral College is what makes this unfair. The president should be voted in by the people, if that is not the case then why are we considered a democracy? On Debate website Debate.Org I read many opinions from other people and they also had the same opinion that I had. The question posed on this website was, “Is the United States Electoral College a fair way to conduct the Presidential Election?” Fourteen percent of the people said yes. Over eighty …show more content…
As most of us know the popular vote was won by Democratic Candidate Al Gore. The Electoral College was won by George W. Bush who would later go on to serve another term from 2004 to 2008. One state had an amount of 29 Electoral College votes. In this case Bush won the state by 537 votes. This gave Bush the presidency although Gore won the popular vote. I do not agree with this since my stance on the Election Process is that the nation as a whole or the majority of the country should decide wether a president is elected or not. This was a key part on why I believe the Electoral College is not the best way to vote a president into running a nation. This was the most recent case of an election being won due to the Electoral College although it is not the first time this has