The Teleological Argument Analysis

Words: 1286
Pages: 6

As observable in all aspects of life there is a creator for almost everything, whether it be laws, machines, or even organisms(This is in a way, the claim that you are trying to argue for, so I would reconsider opening with a claim which is basically assuming that which you are arguing for). Machines are created by intelligent design(What do you mean by 'intelligent design, actually? People?), and laws are created by a law maker. With the complexity of the universe and all the beings that it contains, it is possible that there is a creator that caused these beings to come into existence, namely God. In general, the teleological argument argues for the existence of an intelligent creator, God, based on evidence of design in the natural or physical world. In what …show more content…
What it argues is that the order of the universe as a whole and specifically, the complexity of all beings in the universe are intelligible only if we suppose the involvement of the agency of some being who created everything in order to achieve a desired, preconceived outcome. Three versions of this argument are the biological version, the moral version, and the natural version (which is very similar to Paley’s “watchmaker argument). Paley’s watchmaker argument argues that since the universe displays the same complexity and order as a watch, and a watch is a product of intelligent design, than the universe must also be a product of intelligent design. The biological version of the teleological argument states that due to the complexity of organs and organisms, it appears that there must be a designer, God. The moral version of the teleological argument states that moral laws require a lawmaker, which is also God. And lastly, the natural version of the argument states that the physical universe exhibits a clear display of order, and the best explanation for this order is