Why Did Clay Win The Popular Vote

Words: 437
Pages: 2

The Election of 1824 was inconclusive, meaning it was not a firm conclusion. Jackson won the popular vote and also the Electoral College but his opponents had something else in their mind. The statement of “The Election of 1824 should be considered a corrupt bargain within the federal government to disregard the will of the people.” is valid. While Clay was the Secretary of State, Jackson accused Clay of a corrupting bargain of convincing Congress to elect Adams as President. In the year of 1824, Clay was also running for President. Although in 1825, Clay dropped out and gave his votes to Adams. Clay and Adams disliked each other; Adams supported Clay’s policies of high tariffs, transportation improvements and a strong national bank. Clay, the speaker of the house, scorned both Adams and Jackson. Clay regarded Jackson naming him the fierce western rival. Clay opinion about the election was it would be the greatest misfortune that would ensue the country a tragedy. …show more content…
The names of the candidates were Clay, Adams, Jackson, and Crawford. Crawford’s friends stressed his commitment to the states’ rights and strict establishment of the Constitution. Clay continued to advocates nationalism of his American System. Adams had a mutual of Clay’s belief that the government should finance improvements to spark the economic development. Jackson named himself the “Man of the Common People” and the enemy of social and political of the noble. Jackson won the popular and Electoral votes where he had 99 votes, Adams 84, Crawford 41, and Clay 37. However corresponding to the election of 1800, Jackson did not have enough electoral votes to be fundamental. Before the House of Representatives intercede, Crawford suffered a stroke and was eliminated from the election. Clay dropped out and recommended his supporters in the House of Representatives to give their votes to