Why Was Ulysses S. Grant Effective

Words: 850

Pages: 4

Open Document

Ulysses S. Grant was a military general in the Civil War. Unlike many generals of the Union army, he was willing to go on the offensive instead of waiting for the Confederates to attack. This made him stand out from the rest allowing him to progress through military ranks rather quickly. Grant’s offensive strategy combined with some of the more daring tactics he utilized made him an effective Ulysses S. Grant was born Hiram Ulysses Grant on April 27, 1822 in Point Pleasant, Ohio. His parents were Jesse and Hannah Simpson Grant and he was the oldest of six children. He had two younger sisters and a younger brother by age ten and another brother and sister by his teen years. His father was a farmer and a tanner and had very little education. Jesse pushed for his sons’ education because he wanted them to have more schooling than he did. Ulysses had a love for horses that started as a toddler when he would play in …show more content…
While stationed in Cairo, Illinois he convinced his commanding officer to attack Fort Henry and won the battle. He was offered a truce but said, “No terms except unconditional and immediate surrender can be accepted.” Content with the first significant victory since the Union’s defeat at Bull Run, President Lincoln promoted Grant to Major General. On April 6, 1862, Confederate General Johnston attacked Grant’s badly defended advance force in Shiloh. The first day of battle ended badly for the Union and the army was almost driven into the river. The next morning when reinforcements arrived, Grant called for an attack. They drove the Confederate Army back and they retreated to Corinth. Grant stood out from the rest of the generals because he was willing to go on the offensive instead of waiting for the Confederates to attack. Shiloh was seen as a victory in Washington even though it cost the Union many lives. However, it was just the first of many bloody battles of the civil

Dbq Civil War

write a comprehensive and detailed essay discussing the three most important factors in the Confederacy’s defeat in the Civil War. Be sure to defend your position. The statistics show the reasons that the South lost were confounded in the handicap that was their economic contribution to the war, coupled with their limited manpower and lack of political skills (Commager and Donald, 1996). The North had the type of economy that thrived from wartime production unlike the South whom suffered due to embargo…

Words 2372 - Pages 10

History 112 Essay examples

Question #2 - During Reconstruction, the Republicans continually tried to promote and secure social and political rights for the former slaves. What was some of the major legislation used to achieve these goals and how effective was it? Do you think that the Republicans had the authority to implement this legislation, why or why not? During the reconstruction period, the Republicans were the Americans who continuously fought to protect and preserve the newly granted rights of freed African…

Words 681 - Pages 3

Southern States: Why They Fought In The United States

Why They Fought: Economic: Southern States were agriculture based. The whole of the southern economy rested almost entirely on the price of cotton and tobacco mainly as well as other agriculture crops. Northern States we much more industrialized in the NE, relied upon southern cash crops (cotton) for the manufacture of goods such as wool, shoes, and other fabrics and commodities. The mid-west was caught in the middle, while major cities did make up some of the mid -west, they were cattle and…

Words 5687 - Pages 23

Civil War Terms Essay

Sugar Act (1764) Revenue-raising act passed by the British parliament on sugar and sugar products Was stricter enforcement of earlier Molasses Act of 1733 Angered colonists, taxation without representation Stamp Act (1765) Direct tax on the colonies requiring all printed materials (legal documents, deeds, newspapers, magazines, etc.) to have a stamp on them Colonists had to pay stamp collectors to get stamps Declaratory Act (1766) Repealed the Stamp Act ...but, said parliament "had, hath, and…

Words 8628 - Pages 35

During the Gilded Age (1876-1900), Were the Presidents More Successful with Domestic Affairs or Foreign Affairs? Why? Essay

historians have dubbed Presidents Rutherford B. Hayes, James A. Garfield, Chester A. Arthur, Grover Cleveland, and Benjamin Harrison the “forgotten presidents.” Indeed, it might be argued that the most notable event that occurred during the Gilded Age was the assassination of President Garfield in 1881. His death prompted Congress to pass the Pendleton Act, which created the Civil Service Commission two years later. This commission reformed the spoils system, which had rewarded supporters of a winning…

Words 1933 - Pages 8

U.S. History I Essay examples

Indians first and later African women as wives or concubines. c. Development of the colonies and exploitation of their resources was based on exploiting native people and African slaves as labor. COLUMBUS = BAD; BRUTAL INVASION FOR NEW WORLD Born in Italy to a Wool Weaver; wanted to be a sailor. Went to Portugal and learned navigation. Determined the world was round—by traveling west he could reach the wealth of Asia, Japan, Great Cities, Etc. Begged monarchs to finance his trip. 6th visit…

Words 6303 - Pages 26

Presidential Election Essay

ballots include only the names of the presidential and vice-presidential candidates; in others, they include only names of the electors. Nowadays, it’s rare for electors to be split between parties. The last such occurance was in North Carolina in 1968. On four occasions (last was in 2000),the presidential candidate with the largest popular vote failed to obtain an electoral vote majority. Each state has as many electors as it has senators and representatives, plus 3 electoral votes from the District…

Words 7283 - Pages 30